Juvenile Justice Act, It is for illegal teenagers who have violated the law or are on the verge of violating the law, enactment special criminal law. Different from the social prevention purpose of adult criminal law, it focuses more on correcting the physical and spiritual growth of juveniles, has the nature of juvenile protection. The Detention Policy In Juvenile Justice Act is to keep the juvenile in a certain place to protect the juvenile after entering the judicial process, so as to prevent him from being victimized or indulging in bad habits, and to further investigate the case of the juvenile and identify his physical and mental condition, as a basis for the juvenile court's treatment.
Since the implementation of the Juvenile Justice Act in 1971, the provisions of the detention policy have undergone five revisions, and the detention policy has different goals according to the different attitudes of legislators towards juvenile delinquency and the advancement of juvenile welfare thinking. However, there are only a few stipulations on the norms of the Juvenile Justice Act. It is necessary to discuss whether the density of the norms is sufficient. At the same time, whether the actual operation of the Detention Policy system is in line with the legislative purpose is also the focus of this study. Therefore, this paper interviews five practitioners and refers to relevant literature to clarify the views and predicaments of practitioners in order to clarify the views and predicaments of practitioners. Suggestions for amendments to the law.
The possible problems and solutions of the Detention Policy system under the Juvenile Justice Act are as follows: 1. The requirements for detention are not clear. It is advisable to revise the provisions of the requirements, adding that when judges consider the detention, the need for protection of juveniles should be regarded as the requirement for detention. 2. There are still many deficiencies in the norms of the Detention Policy system, which should be corrected by referring to the period of detention and the relief procedures of the Criminal Procedure Law. 3. The management manpower and professional manpower of the juvenile detention house are insufficient, and the relevant units should implement professional training and employ enough professionals to implement the purpose of correcting and identifying the body and mind of juveniles. 4. The establishment of the Youth Counseling Committee is not yet complete. It is advisable to increase the relevant resources of the unit as soon as possible to achieve the protection intention of Administrative Guidance Advance System.
