少年事件處理法收容制度之研究

CCUR > College of Law > Department of Law & Graduate Institute of Law > thesis > Item 987654321/51557

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/51557

Title:	少年事件處理法收容制度之研究 The Detention Policy in Juvenile Justice Act
Authors:	葉冠承
Contributors:	法律學系
Keywords:	收容收容標準需保護性釋字第664號解釋行政輔導先行少年福利 Detention Policy Detention Standards protective J.Y. Interpretation No. 664 Administrative Guidance Advance System Juvenile Welfare
Date:	2022
Issue Date:	2023-03-14 11:14:20 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	少年事件處理法（下稱少事法），係對於觸法或觸法邊緣之非行少年，制定之刑事特別法，有別於成人刑事法的社會預防目的，更著重於矯治少年的身心成長，具有少年保護之色彩。少事法之收容制度，係在非行少年進入司法程序後，將少年容留於一定處所加以保護，避免其在外受害或濡染惡習，並進一步對少年為個案調查及身心狀況之鑑別，以做為少年法院處遇之依據。自1971年少事法施行以來，收容制度之規定共歷經五次修法，制度也隨著立法者對於少年犯罪的處理態度不同，及少年福利思想的進步，而有不同之目的及定位。惟少事法中對於收容制度之規範僅有數條規定，在規範的密度上是否足夠實有探討之必要。同時，現行收容制度的實務運作，是否契合立法目的，亦是本文研究之重點。是故，本文針對少事法收容制度之運用、看法、場所以及行政輔導先行對收容的影響，訪談五名實務工作者，並參考相關文獻資料，以釐清實務之看法與困境，整理分析後提出修法之建議。現行少事法收容制度可能之問題及其解決方法為：一、收容之要件不明確，宜修正要件之規定，增加法官在考量裁定收容時，應以少年之需保護性作為收容之要件。二、收容制度之規範尚有許多不足，應可參考刑事訴訟法羈押的期間與救濟程序為修正。三、少觀所管理人力及專業人力不足，相關單位應落實專業訓練，並聘用足夠的專業人員，以落實矯治及鑑別少年身心之目的。四、少年輔導委員會之建置尚未完備，宜儘速增加該單位的相關資源，以達行政輔導先行之保護意旨。 Juvenile Justice Act, It is for illegal teenagers who have violated the law or are on the verge of violating the law, enactment special criminal law. Different from the social prevention purpose of adult criminal law, it focuses more on correcting the physical and spiritual growth of juveniles, has the nature of juvenile protection. The Detention Policy In Juvenile Justice Act is to keep the juvenile in a certain place to protect the juvenile after entering the judicial process, so as to prevent him from being victimized or indulging in bad habits, and to further investigate the case of the juvenile and identify his physical and mental condition, as a basis for the juvenile court's treatment. Since the implementation of the Juvenile Justice Act in 1971, the provisions of the detention policy have undergone five revisions, and the detention policy has different goals according to the different attitudes of legislators towards juvenile delinquency and the advancement of juvenile welfare thinking. However, there are only a few stipulations on the norms of the Juvenile Justice Act. It is necessary to discuss whether the density of the norms is sufficient. At the same time, whether the actual operation of the Detention Policy system is in line with the legislative purpose is also the focus of this study. Therefore, this paper interviews five practitioners and refers to relevant literature to clarify the views and predicaments of practitioners in order to clarify the views and predicaments of practitioners. Suggestions for amendments to the law. The possible problems and solutions of the Detention Policy system under the Juvenile Justice Act are as follows: 1. The requirements for detention are not clear. It is advisable to revise the provisions of the requirements, adding that when judges consider the detention, the need for protection of juveniles should be regarded as the requirement for detention. 2. There are still many deficiencies in the norms of the Detention Policy system, which should be corrected by referring to the period of detention and the relief procedures of the Criminal Procedure Law. 3. The management manpower and professional manpower of the juvenile detention house are insufficient, and the relevant units should implement professional training and employ enough professionals to implement the purpose of correcting and identifying the body and mind of juveniles. 4. The establishment of the Youth Counseling Committee is not yet complete. It is advisable to increase the relevant resources of the unit as soon as possible to achieve the protection intention of Administrative Guidance Advance System.
Appears in Collections:	[Department of Law & Graduate Institute of Law ] thesis

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
index.html		0Kb	HTML	233	View/Open

View Licence

Loading...