文化大學機構典藏 CCUR:Item 987654321/44960
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 46965/50831 (92%)
Visitors : 12637348      Online Users : 882
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/44960


    Title: 電子菸與菸草菸對急性運動後心肺反應與運動表現之比較
    The Comparison of Exercise-Induced Cardiorespiratory Responses Following E-cigarette and Tobacco Smoking
    Authors: SUMARTININGSIH), 媞雅 (SRI
    Contributors: 體育學系運動教練碩博士班
    Keywords: heart rate
    blood pressure
    forced vital capacity
    peak expiratory flow
    exercise performance
    Date: 2019
    Issue Date: 2019-08-29 10:10:32 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: Purposes: The purpose of this study is to investigate the acute exercise-induced cardiorespiratory responses and exercises performance following e-cigarette (EC) and tobacco cigarette (TC) smoking. Methods: A randomized crossover design was used. Thirty young male adult smokers were recruited with an average age of 23 years old, and have been smoking for 3.5 years and smoke nine cigarettes a day. The acute smoking interventions were measured at two-day intervals under three conditions: control, free nicotine use EC (EC0), 3 mg nicotine of EC (EC3) and 3 mg nicotine of TC (TC3). A maximal multistage shuttle 20 m run test (MMST) was used for the acute exercise. The measured respiratory and cardiovascular responses were: heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), oxygen saturation (SPO2), forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume within 1 second (FEV1) and peak expiratory flow (PEF). A thrice replication of measurements was taken: baseline, post-smoking, and post-exercise. The prediction of VO2max and time to exhaustion (TTE) were taken during exercise. A two-way repeated measure and one-way ANOVA were used for the data analysis. Results: The result demonstrated that TC3 smoking increased HR and DBP post smoking more than EC0 (HRTC3: 93.3 ± 3.1 and HR EC0: 81.7 ± 2.7 (bpm), p < .05) and (DBP TC3: 83.2 ± 1.2 and DBP EC0: 76 ± 1.8 (mmHg), p < .05) respectively. HR, SBP, and DBP induced by exercise remained unchanged following EC and TC smoking (p > .05). SPO2 and PEF after TC3 smoking were significantly higher than EC0. The predicted VO2max and TTE on TC3 were significantly lower than EC0 (TTE TC3: 365.3 ± 27.3 and TTE EC0: 393.4 ± 27.8, p < .05) and EC3 predicts VO2max (VO2max TC3: 35.6 ± 1.4 and VO2max EC3: 37.4 ± 1.6 (ml/kg/min), p < .05; TTE TC3: 365.3 ± 27.3 and TTE EC3: 394.1 ± 29.6 (s), p < .05). Conclusion: This study concluded that smoking EC had a lower impact on cardiorespiratory responses and exercise performance than TC for smokers.
    Appears in Collections:[Graduate Institute of Sport Coaching Science ] thesis

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML111View/Open


    All items in CCUR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback