English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 47121/50987 (92%)
造訪人次 : 13813261      線上人數 : 236
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    主頁登入上傳說明關於CCUR管理 到手機版


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/35882


    題名: Quantitative Precipitation Estimation of the Epic 2013 Colorado Flood Event: Polarization Radar-Based Variational Scheme
    作者: Chang, WY (Chang, Wei-Yu)
    Vivekanandan, J (Vivekanandan, Jothiram)
    Ikeda, K (Ikeda, Kyoko)
    Lin, PL (Lin, Pay-Liam)
    貢獻者: 大氣系
    關鍵詞: Algorithms
    Data processing
    Radars
    Radar observations
    Remote sensing
    Variational analysis
    Flood events
    日期: 2016-07
    上傳時間: 2017-04-13 09:29:24 (UTC+8)
    摘要: The accuracy of rain-rate estimation using polarimetric radar measurements has been improved as a result of better characterization of radar measurement quality and rain microphysics. In the literature, a variety of power-law relations between polarimetric radar measurements and rain rate are described because of the dynamic or varying nature of rain microphysics. A variational technique that concurrently takes into account radar observational error and dynamically varying rain microphysics is proposed in this study. Rain-rate estimation using the variational algorithm that uses event-based observational error and background rain climatological values is evaluated using observing system simulation experiments (OSSE), and its performance is demonstrated in the case of an epic Colorado flood event. The rain event occurred between 11 and 12 September 2013. The results from OSSE show that the variational algorithm with event-based observational error consistently estimates more accurate rain rate than does the R(Z(HH), Z(DR)) power-law algorithm. On the contrary, the usage of ad hoc or improper observational error degrades the performance of the variational method. Furthermore, the variational algorithm is less sensitive to the observational error of differential reflectivity Z(DR) than is the R(Z(HH), Z(DR)) algorithm. The variational quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE) retrieved more accurate rainfall estimation than did the power-law dual-polarization QPE in this particular event, despite the fact that both algorithms used the same dual-polarization radar measurements from the Next Generation Weather Radar (NEXRAD).
    關聯: JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY AND CLIMATOLOGY 卷: 55 期: 7 頁碼: 1477-1495
    顯示於類別:[大氣系所] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    index.html0KbHTML331檢視/開啟


    在CCUR中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋