文化大學機構典藏 CCUR:Item 987654321/35882
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 47126/50992 (92%)
造访人次 : 13864199      在线人数 : 282
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧:
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号",以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻,建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段,可获得较完整数据
  • 进阶搜寻
    主页登入上传说明关于CCUR管理 到手机版


    jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/35882


    题名: Quantitative Precipitation Estimation of the Epic 2013 Colorado Flood Event: Polarization Radar-Based Variational Scheme
    作者: Chang, WY (Chang, Wei-Yu)
    Vivekanandan, J (Vivekanandan, Jothiram)
    Ikeda, K (Ikeda, Kyoko)
    Lin, PL (Lin, Pay-Liam)
    贡献者: 大氣系
    关键词: Algorithms
    Data processing
    Radars
    Radar observations
    Remote sensing
    Variational analysis
    Flood events
    日期: 2016-07
    上传时间: 2017-04-13 09:29:24 (UTC+8)
    摘要: The accuracy of rain-rate estimation using polarimetric radar measurements has been improved as a result of better characterization of radar measurement quality and rain microphysics. In the literature, a variety of power-law relations between polarimetric radar measurements and rain rate are described because of the dynamic or varying nature of rain microphysics. A variational technique that concurrently takes into account radar observational error and dynamically varying rain microphysics is proposed in this study. Rain-rate estimation using the variational algorithm that uses event-based observational error and background rain climatological values is evaluated using observing system simulation experiments (OSSE), and its performance is demonstrated in the case of an epic Colorado flood event. The rain event occurred between 11 and 12 September 2013. The results from OSSE show that the variational algorithm with event-based observational error consistently estimates more accurate rain rate than does the R(Z(HH), Z(DR)) power-law algorithm. On the contrary, the usage of ad hoc or improper observational error degrades the performance of the variational method. Furthermore, the variational algorithm is less sensitive to the observational error of differential reflectivity Z(DR) than is the R(Z(HH), Z(DR)) algorithm. The variational quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE) retrieved more accurate rainfall estimation than did the power-law dual-polarization QPE in this particular event, despite the fact that both algorithms used the same dual-polarization radar measurements from the Next Generation Weather Radar (NEXRAD).
    關聯: JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY AND CLIMATOLOGY 卷: 55 期: 7 頁碼: 1477-1495
    显示于类别:[大氣系所] 期刊論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    index.html0KbHTML335检视/开启


    在CCUR中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©  2006-2025  - 回馈