文化大學機構典藏 CCUR:Item 987654321/28052
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 47040/50906 (92%)
造访人次 : 13049288      在线人数 : 514
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧:
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号",以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻,建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段,可获得较完整数据
  • 进阶搜寻
    主页登入上传说明关于CCUR管理 到手机版


    jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/28052


    题名: 2005東亞運跆拳道比賽三強技術分析研究
    Chinese Taipei, Korea, and China teams in 2005 Macau East Asia Game skill analysis
    作者: 宋玉麒
    贡献者: 運動教練研究所
    关键词: 跆拳道
    攻擊型態
    技術分析
    Tae Kwon Do
    attack style
    skill analysis
    日期: 2006
    上传时间: 2014-09-05 14:10:40 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本研究的目的,旨在瞭解2005年澳門東亞運動會男子跆拳道比賽,中華隊、韓國隊及中國隊三隊比賽技術的分析。研究利用錄影帶系統觀察之事件記錄法,將其所獲數據進行量化分析,並針對主動與被動、右腳與左腳及對戰時前腳與後腳所搭配的攻擊及得分次數百分比,以二分法與交叉綜合描述,其研究結果為:一、比賽型態:(一)中華隊以主動右後腳、中國隊以主動左後腳、韓國隊以被動右後腳為主要的得分攻擊型態。(二)韓國隊主動與被動攻擊均衡,中華隊較著重主動攻擊,中國隊較著重被動攻擊。三隊皆以後腳攻擊為主。(三)攻擊數的高低依序以中華隊最高、中國隊次之、韓國隊最低;得分率高低依序以韓國隊最高、中華隊次之、中國隊最低;成功率的高低依序以韓國隊最高、中華隊次之、中國隊最低。(四)失分率的高低依序以中華隊最高、中國隊次之、韓國隊最低。二、比賽技術:(一)三隊在本次比賽技術動作的發揮以旋踢為主。(二)中國隊、韓國隊本次比賽成功率以旋踼最高,中華隊以後踢最高。由以上結果得知:韓國隊致勝原因為攻擊型態均衡,高成功率的踢擊,而中華隊與中國隊則較偏重單一攻擊型態。
    The purpose of this study was to analyze of the skill performance of taekwondo players of Chinese Taipei, Korea, and China teams in 2005 Macau East Asia Game. Video tapes were collected from twelve players who performed a total of sixteen competitions. Eight well trained observers were divided into two groups to conduct a crosscheck skill analys the attack and score rate percentage by active and passive, right foot and left foot, and front and rear foot attack. The results were:
    A. Competition type analysis: 1. Chinese Taipei team players focus on active right
    rear foot attack, while China team players used active left rear foot attack, and Korea team players used passive right rear foot as the main scoring attack type; 2. Korea team players used both active and passive attack types while Chinese Taipei team players prefer active attack and China team players prefer passive attack. It was found that all the three teamsplayers were prefer to use rear foot attack as the main attack type; 3. As for attacking figures, Chinese Taipei team players were the highest, China team players were the second, and the Korea team players were the lowest. For scoring, Korea team players were the highest, Chinese Taipei Team players were the second, and China team players were the lowest. As for the skill performing success rate, Korea team plers were the highest, Chinese Taipei Team players were the second, and China team players were the lowest; 4. As for skill performing losing point rate, Chinese Taipei team players were the highest, China team players were the second, and Korea team players were the lowest. B. Skill performance: 1. As for the main skill movement, three teams players used in this game were found front turning kick; and, 2. The highest success rate for China and Korea team players were front turning kick, and Chinese Taipei team players were back kick. I was concluded that the main factors for Korean team players to win the competition was because of the players who can fully used both active and passive attack type as well as their high success-rate kicking, while ChineseTaipei and China team players emphasized single attack type.
    显示于类别:[運動教練研究所] 博碩士論文

    文件中的档案:

    没有与此文件相关的档案.



    在CCUR中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈