文化大學機構典藏 CCUR:Item 987654321/28052
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 47040/50906 (92%)
Visitors : 13049207      Online Users : 537
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/28052


    Title: 2005東亞運跆拳道比賽三強技術分析研究
    Chinese Taipei, Korea, and China teams in 2005 Macau East Asia Game skill analysis
    Authors: 宋玉麒
    Contributors: 運動教練研究所
    Keywords: 跆拳道
    攻擊型態
    技術分析
    Tae Kwon Do
    attack style
    skill analysis
    Date: 2006
    Issue Date: 2014-09-05 14:10:40 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究的目的,旨在瞭解2005年澳門東亞運動會男子跆拳道比賽,中華隊、韓國隊及中國隊三隊比賽技術的分析。研究利用錄影帶系統觀察之事件記錄法,將其所獲數據進行量化分析,並針對主動與被動、右腳與左腳及對戰時前腳與後腳所搭配的攻擊及得分次數百分比,以二分法與交叉綜合描述,其研究結果為:一、比賽型態:(一)中華隊以主動右後腳、中國隊以主動左後腳、韓國隊以被動右後腳為主要的得分攻擊型態。(二)韓國隊主動與被動攻擊均衡,中華隊較著重主動攻擊,中國隊較著重被動攻擊。三隊皆以後腳攻擊為主。(三)攻擊數的高低依序以中華隊最高、中國隊次之、韓國隊最低;得分率高低依序以韓國隊最高、中華隊次之、中國隊最低;成功率的高低依序以韓國隊最高、中華隊次之、中國隊最低。(四)失分率的高低依序以中華隊最高、中國隊次之、韓國隊最低。二、比賽技術:(一)三隊在本次比賽技術動作的發揮以旋踢為主。(二)中國隊、韓國隊本次比賽成功率以旋踼最高,中華隊以後踢最高。由以上結果得知:韓國隊致勝原因為攻擊型態均衡,高成功率的踢擊,而中華隊與中國隊則較偏重單一攻擊型態。
    The purpose of this study was to analyze of the skill performance of taekwondo players of Chinese Taipei, Korea, and China teams in 2005 Macau East Asia Game. Video tapes were collected from twelve players who performed a total of sixteen competitions. Eight well trained observers were divided into two groups to conduct a crosscheck skill analys the attack and score rate percentage by active and passive, right foot and left foot, and front and rear foot attack. The results were:
    A. Competition type analysis: 1. Chinese Taipei team players focus on active right
    rear foot attack, while China team players used active left rear foot attack, and Korea team players used passive right rear foot as the main scoring attack type; 2. Korea team players used both active and passive attack types while Chinese Taipei team players prefer active attack and China team players prefer passive attack. It was found that all the three teamsplayers were prefer to use rear foot attack as the main attack type; 3. As for attacking figures, Chinese Taipei team players were the highest, China team players were the second, and the Korea team players were the lowest. For scoring, Korea team players were the highest, Chinese Taipei Team players were the second, and China team players were the lowest. As for the skill performing success rate, Korea team plers were the highest, Chinese Taipei Team players were the second, and China team players were the lowest; 4. As for skill performing losing point rate, Chinese Taipei team players were the highest, China team players were the second, and Korea team players were the lowest. B. Skill performance: 1. As for the main skill movement, three teams players used in this game were found front turning kick; and, 2. The highest success rate for China and Korea team players were front turning kick, and Chinese Taipei team players were back kick. I was concluded that the main factors for Korean team players to win the competition was because of the players who can fully used both active and passive attack type as well as their high success-rate kicking, while ChineseTaipei and China team players emphasized single attack type.
    Appears in Collections:[Graduate Institute of Sport Coaching Science ] thesis

    Files in This Item:

    There are no files associated with this item.



    All items in CCUR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback