文化大學機構典藏 CCUR:Item 987654321/26791
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 47249/51115 (92%)
Visitors : 14036706      Online Users : 315
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/26791


    Title: Motives and Likelihood of Bribery: An Experimental Study of Managers in Taiwan
    Authors: Wu, WY (Wu, Wann-Yih)
    Huang, CH (Huang, Chu-Hsin (Julie))
    Contributors: Dept Business Adm
    Keywords: motives to bribe
    arbitrariness
    pervasiveness
    perceived distributive fairness
    and likelihood of bribery
    Date: 2013-07
    Issue Date: 2014-02-26 15:34:39 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: Many studies of bribery acknowledge the important role of bribe-givers, but their true motives remain unclear. We propose that the likelihood of bribery depends on the willingness of an organization to affiliate with local parties or to be successful in a host country, or to have power over local parties. We further argue that different opportunities, either pervasive or arbitrary, facilitate different types of motives that affect the likelihood of bribery. In addition, we investigate the effect of perceived fairness on the likelihood of bribery. We employ a 3 (motives: affiliation vs. achievement vs. power)x2 (opportunities: pervasiveness vs. arbitrariness)x2 (perceived fairness: high vs. low) factorial design in experimental settings among Executive MBA students in southern Taiwan. Our findings indicate that, when companies perceive a higher level of distributive fairness, high-achieving organizations are more likely to offer a bribe when the condition is pervasive. When they have a powerful motive, arbitrariness engenders a higher likelihood of bribery. When they perceive less distributive fairness, there are no significant differences between motive and opportunity.
    Relation: ETHICS & BEHAVIOR Volume: 23 Issue: 4 Pages: 278-298
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Business Administration & Graduate Institute of International Business Administration ] periodical articles

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML323View/Open


    All items in CCUR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback