文化大學機構典藏 CCUR:Item 987654321/22455
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 47249/51115 (92%)
造访人次 : 14200943      在线人数 : 549
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻
    主页 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上传 ‧ 说明 ‧ 关于CCUR ‧ 管理 到手机版


    jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/22455


    题名: On Mutual Accreditation between TOEFL and GEPT
    作者: 開一心
    贡献者: 中國文化大學
    关键词: 全民英檢
    成績對照
    托福
    日期: 2006-07-01
    上传时间: 2012-05-16 10:58:00 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 最近語言測驗訓練中心因疑將全民英檢成績灌水有誤導大眾之嫌而遭到掽擊事實上，自2001首度發布英檢與托福成績對照表開始，這兩項評量成績粗估對照的效度與信度就一直受到專家學者的質疑。本質上托福與全民英檢有明顯差異：如二者所採行之評量理論基礎、評量形式、與評量內涵。托福為常模參照評量，而全民英檢為標凖參照評量；同時，二者在設計、形式、目的的形成上以及政規劃考試系統上均有明顯差異。至目前為止，並無科學數據研究顯示二者之有其互通性。如欲將英檢成績直接對應其他英語能力評量成績，應有科學數據說明，否則恐將招致疑慮與困擾。本文分析英檢與托福之評量理論基礎、評量式、與評量內涵，以探究二者間成績對照標準之問題所在，並針對採用英檢或托成績的單位提出相關建言。

    Recently, the Language Training & Testing Center (LTTC) has been impugned for misleading the public with bolstered scores of the 2004 General English Proficiency Tests (GEPT). In fact, ever since the first release of the concordance table of the rough correspondent score comparison between GEPT and TOEFL in 2001, the reliability and validity of the mutual accreditation between the two tests have been questioned by authorities. The substantial disparities between the GEPT and TOEFL reside in the testing approaches, formats, and content of the two tests. TOEFL is grounded in a norm-referenced approach while GEPT is grounded in a criterion-referenced approach. Concomitantly, the two tests have developed with significant differences in designs, formats and purposes. In addition, their administrations and delivery systems are not the same. To date, scientific research documents concerning the mutual accreditation between the two tests is not provided to the public. A correspondent score comparison accredited to GEPT seems to bring in problematic doubts and research pertaining to the scientific interpretations of the scores are indeed indispensable. This paper investigates the problems of mutual accreditation between TOEFL and GEPT by means of an analysis of the testing approaches, formats, and content of the two tests. Suggestions for test users are provided.
    關聯: 華岡英語學報 12期 P.27-46
    显示于类别:[英文系所] 學報-華岡英語學報

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    index.html0KbHTML204检视/开启


    在CCUR中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈