以「史」為學與以「歷史」為學

文化大學機構典藏 CCUR > 文學院 > 文學院 > 學報-華岡文科學報 > Item 987654321/21800

jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/21800

题名:	以「史」為學與以「歷史」為學
作者:	李紀祥
贡献者:	中國文化大學
关键词:	史學歷史學近代史近代意識
日期:	1999-12
上传时间:	2012-03-22 10:41:48 (UTC+8)
摘要:	現行新制學堂中，既有「歷史」為名之學系，亦有以「史」為名之學系，稱名雖異，其課程卻實同之現象，正反映一深值探索之敘事已蘊其中。本文擬欲就近代意識入手，揭視「近代史」原為一種中西與古今座標失衡下之產物；在此之外，更可以有他種故事之可能。不同之起源論述，總是見證著不同之現在；而觀自我之過去狀態，亦非僅祇有一種「歷史」版本。因之以「史」為學與以「歷史」為學，總是須反省自己是否已在某種版本牢籠之中。 In current new-style schools, there are departments of “historical narrative" (li-shi,歷史) and ones of “narrative" (shi,史). Yet, different names make no difference to curriculum, which truly deserves a true reflection upon the existence of the concept of “narrative" as embedded in the new-style curriculum design. This paper attempts to go with and through modem consciousness of this, looking to it that,“modem history" is originally a result of spheric unbalance, East and West, Ancient and Modem. Also, it is a “narrative" of other species. Discourses upon the origin witness difference in contemporality; and, reflection upon the subject in the past proves “histories" in difference. Consequently, be it in the discipline of “narrative" or in that of “historical narrative", as caged is always the subject as reflected in “histories" .
關聯:	華岡文科學報 23 民88.12 頁201-218
显示于类别:	[文學院] 學報-華岡文科學報

文件中的档案:

档案	描述	大小	格式	浏览次数
index.html		0Kb	HTML	684	检视/开启

在CCUR中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.

数据加载中.....