以「史」為學與以「歷史」為學

CCUR > College of Liberal Arts > College of Libral Arts > Hwa Kang journal of humanities > Item 987654321/21800

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/21800

Title:	以「史」為學與以「歷史」為學
Authors:	李紀祥
Contributors:	中國文化大學
Keywords:	史學歷史學近代史近代意識
Date:	1999-12
Issue Date:	2012-03-22 10:41:48 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	現行新制學堂中，既有「歷史」為名之學系，亦有以「史」為名之學系，稱名雖異，其課程卻實同之現象，正反映一深值探索之敘事已蘊其中。本文擬欲就近代意識入手，揭視「近代史」原為一種中西與古今座標失衡下之產物；在此之外，更可以有他種故事之可能。不同之起源論述，總是見證著不同之現在；而觀自我之過去狀態，亦非僅祇有一種「歷史」版本。因之以「史」為學與以「歷史」為學，總是須反省自己是否已在某種版本牢籠之中。 In current new-style schools, there are departments of “historical narrative" (li-shi,歷史) and ones of “narrative" (shi,史). Yet, different names make no difference to curriculum, which truly deserves a true reflection upon the existence of the concept of “narrative" as embedded in the new-style curriculum design. This paper attempts to go with and through modem consciousness of this, looking to it that,“modem history" is originally a result of spheric unbalance, East and West, Ancient and Modem. Also, it is a “narrative" of other species. Discourses upon the origin witness difference in contemporality; and, reflection upon the subject in the past proves “histories" in difference. Consequently, be it in the discipline of “narrative" or in that of “historical narrative", as caged is always the subject as reflected in “histories" .
Relation:	華岡文科學報 23 民88.12 頁201-218
Appears in Collections:	[College of Libral Arts] Hwa Kang journal of humanities

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
index.html		0Kb	HTML	638	View/Open

Loading...