傳聞法則之研究

文化大學機構典藏 CCUR > 法學院 > 法律學系暨法律學研究所 > 博碩士論文 > Item 987654321/53990

jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/53990

题名:	傳聞法則之研究 A Study on Hearsay Rule
作者:	陳麗娜 Chen, Li-Na
贡献者:	法律學系碩士在職專班
关键词:	傳聞法則證據能力傳聞例外傳聞證據對質詰問權 Hearsay rule evidence capacity hearsay exception hearsay evidence right of cross-examination
日期:	2025
上传时间:	2025-03-14 16:05:14 (UTC+8)
摘要:	我國於2003年修訂刑事訴訟法，採改良式當事人進行主義，明文規定刑事訴訟法第159條採傳聞法則，增訂刑事訴訟法第159條之1至159條之5傳聞法則例外規定，正式啟動我國傳聞法則之運作。傳聞法則(Hearsay rule)，一言之即原則上排除傳聞證據作為證據來源之法則，再藉由其他例外規定對傳聞證據賦予證據能力。我國刑事訴訟制度自採用傳聞法則迄今已逾20年，傳聞法則與對質詰問權兩者之關連性、刑事訴訟法第159條之1至159條之5傳聞法則例外，均累積大量實務見解與學說，其論述觀點亦不盡相同。本文依序回顧傳聞法則發展的歷史演進及理論，再接續探究美國、日本及我國傳聞法則及其例外之沿革規範與適用，及探討我國詰問權保障與傳聞法則運作關係，最後於我國實務傳聞法則之運作模式，藉由全面廣泛瀏覽研析我國實務上判決、及學說觀點，進而探悉目前立法規範下與現行實務運作適用上，是否有立法修補及調適彈性密度之情形。如上所述，綜合本文各章節及研究發現之結論，提出本文之看法及適當修法建議，並期許擬制訂製專屬且符合臺灣獨特性之本土化之傳聞法則。 In 2003, Taiwan revised the Criminal Procedure Law, adopting the reformed litigant principle, explicitly stipulating the hearsay rule in Article 159 of the Criminal Procedure Law, and adding exceptions to the hearsay rule in Articles 159-1 to 159-5 of the Criminal Procedure Law, officially launching our country's Criminal Procedure Law. The operation of the law of hearsay. The hearsay rule, in a word, is a rule that excludes hearsay evidence as a source of evidence in principle, and then uses other exceptions to confer evidence capacity on hearsay evidence. It has been more than 20 years since the hearsay rule was adopted in our country's criminal procedure system. A large amount of practical insights and theories have been accumulated on the relationship between the hearsay rule and the right of cross-examination, as well as the exception of the hearsay rule in Articles 159-1 to 159-5 of the Criminal Procedure Law. , and their discussion points are also different. This article sequentially reviews the historical evolution and theory of the development of the hearsay law, and then continues to explore the evolution, norms and application of the hearsay law and its exceptions in the United States, Japan and Taiwan, and explores the relationship between the protection of the right of cross-examination and the operation of the hearsay law in Taiwan. Finally, it discusses the practical hearsay law in Taiwan. By comprehensively and extensively browsing and analyzing the practical judgments and doctrinal opinions of our country, we will explore whether there are any legislative amendments and adjustments to the flexibility density under the current legislative norms and current practical application. As mentioned above, based on the conclusions of each chapter of this article and the research findings, the opinions of this article and appropriate suggestions for revision of the law are put forward, and it is expected to formulate a localized hearsay law that is exclusive and consistent with Taiwan's uniqueness.
显示于类别:	[法律學系暨法律學研究所] 博碩士論文

文件中的档案:

档案	描述	大小	格式	浏览次数
index.html		0Kb	HTML	34	检视/开启

检视Licence

在CCUR中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.

数据加载中.....