| 摘要: | 本研究探討了「MeToo運動」在台灣社會中的呈現方式，特別是新聞與社群媒體如何建構與詮釋「性犯罪」及「性騷擾」議題的部分。研究透過快析輿情資料庫，選取2023年「MeToo運動」爆發後兩個月內的14,547則新聞和7,196則社群貼文並透過語料庫輔助論述分析，旨在分析新聞與社群媒體兩者論述存在那些差異以及兩者在metoo運動中的所扮演角色。
研究結果顯示，新聞報導多集中於「演藝圈」與「政治領域」的性騷擾事件，並強調法律規範及社會反應，建構了性騷擾的法律框架與懲罰機制。然而，社群媒體則較為關注受害者的處境，批判社會結構性問題與制度缺陷，並藉由「群我論述」試圖建立新社會價值觀，強調性別平等和對受害者的支持。
從Leifermann所提出的四個層面論述來看，可以發現在個人論述層面，新聞文本聚焦於個案事件，受害者往往成為故事的核心，而在社群討論中，個人層面的論述較為隱性，更多聚焦於整體社會結構與價值觀的改變。系統性論述方面，新聞關注權力濫用與法律規範的不完善，社群則進一步討論制度的缺失及社會的無形壓力，並呼籲政府改革法律，提供更多支持受害者的資源。而在性別平等和法律框架上的論述上，新聞的討論較少涉及性別不平等問題，反觀社群則是強烈批判父權體制下的性別不平等現象。法律技術層面的討論中，新聞關注法律規範的修訂，社群除了強調修法則強調教育與預防措施。
This study explores the representation of the "MeToo movement" in Taiwanese society, particularly how news and social media construct and interpret issues related to "sexual crimes" and "sexual harassment." The research analyzes 14,547 news articles and 7,196 social media posts from the two months following the outbreak of the "MeToo movement" in 2023, using the Public Opinion Database and corpus-assisted discourse analysis. The aim is to examine the differences in discourse between news and social media and the roles they play in the MeToo movement.
The results show that news reports mainly focus on sexual harassment incidents in the "entertainment industry" and "political realm," emphasizing legal regulations and social reactions, thereby constructing a legal framework and punitive mechanism for sexual harassment. On the other hand, social media tends to focus more on the victims' situations, criticizing structural social problems and institutional flaws, and using "collective discourse" to attempt to establish new social values, emphasizing gender equality and support for victims.
From the four-discourse framework proposed by Leifermann, it can be observed that on the personal discourse level, news texts center around individual cases, with victims often becoming the core of the story. In contrast, personal-level discourse in social media is more implicit, with a greater focus on changing the overall social structure and values. In terms of systemic discourse, news focuses on the abuse of power and the inadequacy of legal regulations, while social media further discusses institutional deficiencies and the invisible social pressures, calling for government reforms and more resources to support victims. Regarding gender equality and the legal framework, news discussions rarely address gender inequality, whereas social media strongly criticizes gender inequality under the patriarchal system. In terms of legal technical discourse, news focuses on the revision of legal regulations, while social media emphasizes not only legal amendments but also education and preventive measures. |
