| 摘要: | 本研究致力於建立一套針對國軍戰鬥體適能競技能力的評價指標體系，同時深入分析這些指標間的相對權重關係。研究過程邀請了23位在國軍體能與戰術技能領域具有豐富經驗的學術專家和實務人員，組成了一個多元的專家團隊。在資料收集與分析的過程中，採用了包括文獻分析、專家訪談、德菲法、層級分析法和焦點團體訪談等多種研究方法，並利用SPSS for Windows 26.0和Expert Choice 2000等專業軟體進行統計分析。研究結果顯示，國軍戰鬥體適能競技能力指標涵蓋了“體能”、“技術能力”、“戰術能力”和“心智能力”四大構面，並進一步細化為12個要素指標和40個細項指標，這些指標均被證實具有高度的適切性和效度。在相對權重方面，四大構面按重要性排序為：“體能”、“技術能力”、“戰術能力”和“心智能力”。不同專家群體在對“心智能力”構面的重視程度上存在差異，其中學術專家給予了相對較高的權重。在細分指標層面，“進階體能”、“動作品質”、“戰術應用”和“心理技能”分別在其所屬構面中獲得了較高的相對權重。根據研究結果，提出了一系列建議，旨在為軍隊的訓練、評估和專業人才培養提供參考，從而提高部隊在體能和戰技訓練方面的整體效果。
This study is committed to establishing a set of evaluation indicators for the combat physical fitness and competitive ability of the national military, while also delving into the relative weight relationships between these indicators. During the research process, 23 academic experts and practitioners with rich experience in the field of military physical fitness and tactical skills were invited to form a diverse expert team.In the process of data collection and analysis, a variety of research methods were adopted, including literature analysis, expert interviews, the Delphi method, analytic hierarchy process, and focus group interviews. Professional software such as SPSS for Windows 26.0 and Expert Choice 2000 were used for statistical analysis.The research results show that the indicators for the combat physical fitness and competitive ability of the national military cover four major dimensions: “physical fitness,” “technical ability,” “tactical ability,” and “mental ability.” These have been further refined into 12 elemental indicators and 40 detailed indicators, all of which have been confirmed to have a high degree of appropriateness and validity. In terms of relative weight, the four major dimensions are ranked in order of importance as follows: “physical fitness,” “technical ability,” “tactical ability,” and “mental ability.” Differences exist among different expert groups in the emphasis placed on the “mental ability” dimension, with academic experts giving it a relatively higher weight. At the level of subdivided indicators, “advanced physical fitness,” “movement quality,” “tactical application,” and “psychological skills” respectively obtained higher relative weights in their respective dimensions. Based on the research results, a series of recommendations have been proposed, aiming to provide references for the military’s training, assessment, and professional talent cultivation, thereby enhancing the overall effectiveness of troops in physical and combat skill training. |
