文化大學機構典藏 CCUR:Item 987654321/52988
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 46962/50828 (92%)
Visitors : 12423134      Online Users : 649
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/52988


    Title: 機器學習與深度學習對企業財務危機預測能力之探討
    Discussion on Machine Learning and Deep Learning on the Ability of Enterprise Financial Distress Prediction
    Authors: 許家銘
    Contributors: 會計學系
    Keywords: 財務危機預測
    機器學習
    深度學習
    卷積神經網路
    Date: 2023
    Issue Date: 2023-10-04 14:08:58 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 近幾年因市場需求改變,許多企業皆發生破產與倒閉問題,而財務危機預測模型的建立能提早避免不必要的危機發生。本研究以台灣經濟新報(Taiwan Economic Journal, TEJ)收集2012年至2022年發生財務危機之台灣上下市櫃公司為主要研究對象並以1:1進行配對,其中包含19個財務變數及5個非財務變數。以兩階段做建構模型,第一階段使用決策樹C5.0與隨機森林來進行重要變數之篩選。第二階段再以卷積神經網路(CNN)、循環神經網路(RNN)與支援向量機(SVM)分別建立有效之財務危機預測模型。C5.0、RF搭配CNN與C5.0、RF搭配RNN所分析出之平均準確率均皆為85%以上,而C5.0、RF搭配SVM僅有80%左右,這表明了深度學習較機器學習更為優秀,對財務指標變數有更佳的預測能力。
    In recent years, due to changes in market demand, many enterprises have experienced bankruptcy and bankruptcy problems, and the establishment of financial crisis prediction models can avoid unnecessary crises in advance. This study focuses on Taiwanese OTC companies that experienced financial crises from 2012 to 2022, collected by the Taiwan Economic Journal (TEJ), and paired them in a 1:1 ratio, including 19 financial variables and 5 non-financial variables. The model is constructed in two stages, with the first stage using decision tree C5.0 and random forest to screen important variables. In the second stage, effective financial crisis prediction models are established using convolutional neural networks (CNN), recurrent neural networks (RNN), and support vector machines (SVM), respectively. The average accuracy of C5.0, RF combined with CNN and C5.0, RF combined with RNN was all above 85%, while C5.0, RF combined with SVM was only about 80%, indicating that deep learning is better than machine learning and has better predictive ability for financial indicator variables.
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Accounting & Graduate Institute of Accounting] Thesis

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML345View/Open


    All items in CCUR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback