本論文以樂陞案為研究對象，該案於民國(以下同)2017年1月由臺灣臺北地方法院檢察署偵結起訴，於2018年2月由臺灣臺北地方法院刑事一審判決，另於2018年11月由臺灣高等法院刑事二審判決，檢視本案相關人等有涉及洗錢防制法所列犯罪行為，卻在上述起訴書及一、二審判決中並未依洗錢防制法條文量刑，甚至未有對於洗錢防制法條文適用與否加以說明，由於國際對於洗錢防制法日趨重視，惟國內對於洗錢防制法的條文規範、實務適用及相關討論略有不足，希望透過司法院相關判決及公開資訊等各項資料，找到問題所在及日後建議修法的方向。具體而言，本研究蒐集洗錢的定義，各國及我國對於洗錢防制法的重視及合作，司法院對樂陞案一、二審判決內容，來探討該案法條之適用，並比較我國自1996年頒布洗錢防制法後歷次修法之新舊法及想像競合對於本案之影響等，讓洗錢防制法不只是規範一般人民，更能對於不法企業能產生有效嚇阻，健全公司治理制度，維持資本市場秩序。
This thesis takes the XPEC case as the research object. The case was investigated and prosecuted by the Taiwan Taipei District Court Prosecutor's Office in January 2017 , and was judged by the Taiwan Taipei District Court in February 2018. In November 2018, the criminal second-instance judgment of the Taiwan High Court reviewed that the persons involved in this case were involved in the crimes listed in the Money Laundering Prevention Law, but in the above-mentioned indictment and the first and second-instance judgments, they did not follow the provisions of the Money Laundering Prevention Law. There is an explanation on whether the provisions of the money laundering prevention law are applicable or not. Due to the increasing emphasis on the money laundering prevention law in the world, there is a slight lack of domestic regulations on the provisions of the money laundering prevention law, practical application and related discussions. Public information and other materials to find out the problem and the direction of proposed amendments in the future. Specifically, this study collects the definition of money laundering, the importance and cooperation of various countries and my country on money laundering prevention laws, and the content of the first and second instance judgments of the XPEC case by the Judiciary to explore the application of the law in this case, and compare my country's 1996 After the promulgation of the Money Laundering Prevention Law in 2011, the old and new laws and the imaginative impact of competition on this case, etc., let the Money Laundering Prevention Law not only regulate ordinary people, but also effectively deter illegal enterprises, improve the corporate governance system, and maintain capital market order.
