構成要件與法定要件之區辨─結合犯存廢論

文化大學機構典藏 CCUR > 法學院 > 法律學系暨法律學研究所 > 博碩士論文 > Item 987654321/52710

jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/52710

题名:	構成要件與法定要件之區辨─結合犯存廢論 The Distinguishing Between the Criminal Elements and Statutory Elements of Incorporating Crimes - Retention or Abrogation
作者:	李庭含
贡献者:	法律學系
关键词:	法益構成要件法定要件罪刑法定原則結合犯
日期:	2023
上传时间:	2023-07-06 13:17:43 (UTC+8)
摘要:	結合犯，作為實定法存在已久之規定，眾人目光始終聚焦於犯罪解釋論下之刑罰加重特徵，乃至其是否為排除競合論適用之特別規定。鑒於前述思脈所生之各式論述，在歷經一陣討論熱潮過後，仍舊未圓滿解決眾人對於結合犯立法之質疑，如鯁在喉般存於我國刑事立法當中。結合犯所生治絲益棼之困惑，本文確信係源於忽略構成要件之掌握，是以本文擬從犯罪立法論之思路，還原構成要件之本來面目，藉以區隔立法權行使下之法定要件，論證結合犯屬裹著法定要件之糖衣，實為無構成要件之毒藥。其背後所隱含係我國特有歷史下，行政權出於特定政策之維護，而與立法權聯袂之立法錯誤，有違當代刑法思潮下節制國家刑罰權發動之旨，繼而主張應將結合犯揚棄之結論。 Incorporating crimes, as a long-standing stipulation of positive law, has always been focused on the characteristics of enhanced penalties under the theory of crime interpretation, and even whether, as a specified provision which excludes the application of the theory of coopetition. Given the various discourses raised from the aforestated mindsets, after a wave of heated discussion, the doubts on the legislation of incorporating crimes still have not yet been satisfactorily addressed, as if a fish bone is stuck in one’s throat, existing in our nation’s criminal legislation. In the light of the worsening confusion arises from incorporating crimes, this article is based on a firm belief that the cause came from the overlooked understanding of the elements of crime, and thus it is to change the mindsets of others on criminal legislation and to restore the true features of constitute elements, so as to distinguish the statutory elements of the exercise of legislative power, and to demonstrate that incorporating crimes is sugar-coated with statutory requirements, which in fact is poisonous for the constitutive elements. What is implied behind it is with the unique history of our nation, administrative power has been combined with legislative power to protect specific policies, which violates the purpose of restraining the exercise of the country’s penalty power upon the current tide of thought on criminal law and hence claims the sublation of incorporating crimes.
显示于类别:	[法律學系暨法律學研究所] 博碩士論文

文件中的档案:

档案	描述	大小	格式	浏览次数
index.html		0Kb	HTML	106	检视/开启

检视Licence

在CCUR中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.

数据加载中.....