目的：本研究為比較PNF（Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation；本體感覺神經肌肉伸展術）伸展訓練與傳統雜技伸展訓練兩種訓練方式，對髖關節柔軟度的影響。方法：研究對像為國立台灣戲曲學院國中部學生四十名，分為PNF組與傳統組，進行六週的伸展訓練，並觀察訓練前後四項髖關節柔軟度變項（坐姿體前彎、仰式正劈、躺姿右腳正扳腿、躺姿左腳正扳腿）之差異。結果：經六週訓練後，PNF組在四項髖關節柔軟度之前後測有顯著進步，傳統組則未見顯著進步；但PNF組僅在躺姿右腳正扳腿與躺姿左腳正扳腿動作，訓練效果優於傳統組並達顯著水準（p＜.05）。結論：雜技學生的髖關節柔軟度，透過六週的PNF伸展訓練，比傳統雜技伸展訓練更為有效。
Purpose: The study was to compare the effect between both, PNF (Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation) stretching training method and traditional acrobatic stretching training method on hip flexibility of acrobatic students. Method: Firstly, forty students of National Taiwan College of Performing Arts were divided into PNF group and traditional acrobatic group for six weeks of training. Secondly, we to compare the training effects of hip flexibility related parameters (Sit and Reach, Supine Splits with Hip Flexibility, Supine Splits with Right leg and Supine Splits with Left leg) between pre-training and post-training. Results: The effects of training of PNF group were obviously progressive on four kinds of hip flexibilities (p < .05). The traditional acrobatic group was not. Yet it was found that the effects of training on both supine splits with right leg and supine Splits with Left leg, the PNF group was better than traditional acrobatic group (p < .05). Conclusion: Through six weeks of training, we found that PNF training was more effective than traditional acrobatic training on hip flexibility of acrobatic students.
