| 摘要: | 探討福洛斯功能性加壓帶 (Flossband) 以不同使用手法介入，對於誘發肌肉疲勞後恢復肌力及本體感覺是否有效益。方法：以 14 名健康一般大學生為研究對象，以最大自主反覆向心運動誘發肌肉疲勞。分別於誘發疲勞前、後及恢復處理介入後，以 60 度/秒等速肌力儀進行股四頭肌肌力測試及膝關節本體感覺測試。三種恢復處理介入方法分別為，(一)以 Flossband 纏繞後加上被動伸展，一次 2 分 30 秒，施作 2 次，纏繞加施作總時間為 5 分鐘；(二)以 Flossband 纏繞
後加上徒手按摩，一次 2 分 30 秒，施作 2 次，纏繞加施作總時間為 5 分鐘；(三)以 Flossband 纏繞後，靜置休息 5 分鐘，一次 2 分 30 秒，施作 2 次，纏繞加施作總時間為 5 分鐘。以重複量數變異數分析 ( repeated measured ANOVA ) 對三種不同恢復方式在疲勞前測與後測表現，進行同質性考驗，以確保三組間疲勞前與疲勞後是否同質，每一種恢復方式以重複量數變異數分析考驗疲勞前及疲勞後之比較差異，當達到顯著水準時，再以 Bonferroni 法進行事後分析比較恢復進步率，所有統計顯著水準訂為 α=.05; 利用恢復後數值減掉疲勞後數值除以恢復後數值，得知恢復進步率。結果：(一)在力量表現方面 Flossband 按摩組及 Flossband控制組恢復成效皆達顯著差異；而Flossband伸展組則是在最大力量達顯著恢復，平均力量並未達顯著恢復；Flossband 按摩組最大力量及平均力量 ( 176.1 ± 13.4 N-M；116.4 ± 9 N-M )，恢復進步率分別約 10% 及 14% ；Flossband 控制組 ( 164.4 ± 12.7 N-M；101.7 ± 6.6 N-M )，恢復進步率分別約 8% 及 6%，Flossband 伸展組( 161.1 ± 11.7 N-M；102.4 ± 6.3 N-M )，恢復進步率分別約 6% 及 7%，以 Flossband按摩組效果較佳。(二)在本體感覺方面，進行三組疲勞前與疲勞後重複量數同質性考驗，比較組間是否有顯著差異，結果得知組間沒有達到顯著差異 ( p =.159 )；以重複量數比較是否達顯著差異，發現受試者每次進行反覆最大自主向心運動後，
僅有 Flossband 按摩組（2.3 ± 1.9 度）達到顯著差異；Flossband 伸展組（2.8 ± 1.4
度）及 Flossband 控制組（3.0 ± 0.5 度）本體感覺皆未達到顯著差異。結論：運動疲勞後使用 Flossband 加上按摩及 Flossband 纏繞靜置休息對於最大力量及平均力量皆能達有效恢復，其中又以 Flossband 加上按摩恢復效果較佳；在本體感覺上，僅有 Flossband 按摩組恢復效果達到顯著差異。
To investigate the effectiveness of Flossband in restoring muscle
strength and proprioception after inducing muscle fatigue. Methods: Fourteen healthy college students were selected as research subjects to induce muscle fatigue by maximal autonomous repetitive centrimetry. Quadriceps muscle strength test and knee joint proprioception test were performed with 60 ° / SEC isokinetometer before, after and after fatigue induction. The three intervention methods of recovery treatment were as follows: (1) Flossband winding followed by passive stretching was applied twice for 2 minutes and 30 seconds at a time, and the total time of winding and applying was 5 minutes; (2) Flossband winding and freehand massage were applied twice for 2 minutes and 30 seconds each time, and the total time of twisting and applying was 5 minutes; (3) After winding with Flossband, rest for 5 minutes and apply it twice for 2 minutes and 30 seconds each time. The total time of winding and applying it is 5 minutes. A homogeneity test was conducted for the performance of three different recovery methods in pre - and post-fatigue tests by repeated measurement ANOVA to ensure whether the three groups were homogenous before and after fatigue. The comparative difference between each recovery method before and after fatigue was tested by
repeated measurement ANOVA. When significant levels were reached, Bonferroni method was used for post-mortem analysis to compare the recovery progress rate. All statistical significant levels were set as α=.05. The recovery progress rate was obtained by dividing the value after fatigue subtraction by the value after recovery. Results: (1) In terms of strength performance, the recovery effect of Flossband massage group and Flossband control group was significantly different; The Flossband stretching group recovered significantly at maximum strength, but not at average strength. Maximum strength and average strength of Flossband massage group (176.1 ± 13.4 n-m; 116.4 ± 9 n-m), about 10% and 14%, respectively. Flossband control group (164.4 ± 12.7n-m; 101.7 ± 6.6n-m), the recovery improvement rate was about 8% and 6%, respectively, in Flossband stretching group (161.1 ± 11.7n-m; 102.4 ± 6.3N-m), and the recovery improvement rate was about 6% and 7%, respectively. (2) On the proprioceptive release surface, the homogeneity test of repetition quantity before and after fatigue was carried out in the three groups to compare whether there was a significant difference between the groups, and the results showed that there was no significant difference between the groups (P =.159); It was found that only the Flossband massage group (2.3 ± 1.9 degrees) had a significant difference after each repeated maximum autonomic concentric movement. There was no significant difference in proprioception between the Flossband stretching group (2.8 ± 1.4 degree) and the Flossband control group (3.0 ± 0.5 degree). Conclusion: After exercise fatigue, Flossband plus massage and Flossband winding rest can effectively recover the maximum strength and average strength, among which Flossband plus massage has better recovery effect. In terms of proprioception, only the Flossband group achieved significant difference in recovery effect. |
