文化大學機構典藏 CCUR:Item 987654321/51723
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 47249/51115 (92%)
造访人次 : 14387524      在线人数 : 592
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧:
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号",以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻,建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段,可获得较完整数据
  • 进阶搜寻
    主页登入上传说明关于CCUR管理 到手机版


    jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/51723


    题名: 標準必要專利之研究-以FRAND授權承諾為中心
    A Study on Standard Essential Patents : Focusing on FRAND Commitment
    作者: 劉舒容
    贡献者: 法律學系
    关键词: 標準必要專利
    專利箝制
    權利金堆疊
    F/RAND承諾
    合理權利金
    禁制令
    競爭法
    獨占
    standard essential patents
    patent hold-up
    royalty stacking
    F/RAND commitment
    reasonable royalty
    injunction
    Competition Law
    monopoly
    日期: 2022
    上传时间: 2023-03-21 14:12:23 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 近年來標準必要專利訴訟,例如Microsoft v. Motorola案、Huawei v. ZTE案、Qualcomm案等,乃國際間所關注之焦點。而各國之行政與司法部門所為之裁決,莫不影響著企業之專利布局與技術領先地位,以及全球經濟與產業之發展。然而,探究該等訴訟之內容,除了案件複雜性甚高之外,其中更涉及鉅額權利金之判斷,禁制令核發之標準,以及企業對自由競爭市場之影響。

    本文將以標準必要專利為主題,依序探討標準與專利結合之原因、標準必要專利所挾帶之風險、標準制定組織如何預防採行標準必要專利所產生之問題、專利權人於接受標準制定組織之智慧財產政策後,其所為的F/RAND授權承諾性質為何、權利金又是如何計算。此外,在標準必要專利權人負有授權義務的情況下,專利權人是否尚得行使專利排他權而請求禁制令、各國對於標準必要專利案件之禁制令核發門檻有無不同、以及標準必要專利與競爭法之關連。

    Standard essential patents cases such as Microsoft v. Motorola, Huawei v. ZTE and FTC v. Qualcomm have become focuses concerned by world in recent years. The decisions made by administrative and judicial departments of each country not only affect the enterprise’s patent strategy and the leadership of technology, but also the development of global economy and industry. These standard essential patents cases are taken seriously by international because of their complex background, huge royalties, factor of injunction, and the impact of world market.

    This essay will focus on standard essential patents and study the factors for the combination of standards and patents, the risks of essential patents and how the standard-setting organizations prevent the problems of essential patents from occurring. Besides, what the legal basis of the F/RAND commitment is and how the reasonable royalties will be calculated once the patentee accepts the intellectual property policy regulated by the standard-setting organizations. Can the patentee claims the patent right and asks an injunction under the F/RAND commitment? Are there any differences in factor of injunction about standard essential patents cases in the different countries? What is the relationship between standard essential patents and Competition Law? These issues will be discussed in subsequent chapters.
    显示于类别:[法律學系暨法律學研究所] 博碩士論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    index.html0KbHTML274检视/开启


    在CCUR中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈