English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 46962/50828 (92%)
造訪人次 : 12435913      線上人數 : 543
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    主頁登入上傳說明關於CCUR管理 到手機版


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/51670


    題名: 警務人員使用槍械之適法性研究
    Research on the Appropriateness of Police Use of Firearms.
    作者: 周冠君
    貢獻者: 法律學系碩士在職專班
    關鍵詞: 用槍時機判斷
    誤想防衛
    客觀歸責理論
    在職教育訓練
    use gun timing to judge
    misconception defense
    objective accountability theory
    on-the-job education and training
    日期: 2022
    上傳時間: 2023-03-17 10:07:34 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 目前實務界對於警務人員使用槍械時機判斷討論與研究很少,本文藉由分析司法判決,就我國法院判決與警務人員用槍案例分析,並以警械使用條例之實證研究,找出歷年警務人員為何要使用槍械?判決中警務人員用槍判斷依據之類型?犯罪現場用槍前舉證重要性?警械使用條例有關用槍判斷之規定,實有予以探討之必要,未來有必要改進,並充實教育訓練,以提高警務人員用槍的準確度,及出庭應訊之技巧,始能符合警務人員應勤需要及百姓期待,讓警務人員使用槍械之適法性更為完善,上述議題,均屬值得思考及探討之課題。
    故,本研究焦點,不在於警務人員使用槍械適法性辯證,而是期盼對開槍前,在警務人員心理上的腹案,提供正確方法。研究方法,主要從歷年司法判決中,解析使用槍械前,基於何理由判斷要用開槍,對於開槍判斷心理動作,建立起說服力,如此情形,即可得知法官審理警務人員使用槍械之關鍵何在?進而從司法判決中分析常見之使用槍械判斷類型後,如何界定現場舉證的作為的重要性,提出建議

    At present, there is little discussion and research in the practical circles on the judgment of the police using firearms, through the analysis of judicial judgments, the analysis of the cases of court judgments and police guns in our country, and the empirical study of the police use regulations to find out why the police have used firearms over the years. What type of judgment is the type of police officer's judgment based on? The importance of evidence in front of a gun at the scene of a crime? The provisions of the Police Equipment Use Ordinance on the use of firearms are necessary to be discussed, and it is necessary to improve them in the future and enrich education and training to improve the accuracy of the use of guns by police officers, so as to meet the needs of the police and the expectations of the people, so that the applicability of police officers in the use of firearms can be improved.
    Therefore, the focus of this study is not on the use of firearms by police officers to legalize the evidence, but on the expectation of providing the correct method in the psychological abdomen of police officers before firing the gun. The research method, mainly from the judicial judgments over the years, analyzes the reasons for judging the use of guns before using firearms, and establishes persuasion for the psychological action of judging guns. After analyzing the common types of firearms in judicial judgments, how to define the importance of on-the-spot evidence is made and make suggestions.
    顯示於類別:[法律學系暨法律學研究所] 博碩士論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    index.html0KbHTML233檢視/開啟


    在CCUR中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋