English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 47039/50905 (92%)
造訪人次 : 12979618      線上人數 : 373
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    主頁登入上傳說明關於CCUR管理 到手機版


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/51192


    題名: 結果犯與行為犯之區辨
    Delineation of Consequential Offenses and Conduct Crimes
    作者: 蔡孝謙
    貢獻者: 法律學系
    關鍵詞: 結果犯
    行為犯
    構成要件
    法益
    日期: 2022
    上傳時間: 2023-02-24 14:38:25 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 構成要件之功能與意義,就解釋論上之構成要件而言,構成要件是法益危害行為事實經類型化之法律概念,其在客觀形象上,必須可從不同之結構關係,反映出類型化之型態特徵,以便作為理解時之輔助認知。刑法上對於犯罪類型進行區分,其主要之意義,乃在於透過類型化之認識,得以在個別犯罪之構成要件認知上,以及構成要件效力範圍之掌握上,有一通盤性之認識。同時,亦可對於個別構成要件之犯罪屬性,透過類型分析之理解,而精確掌握各個犯罪成立要件之涵意,並提供不成文構成要件要素之補充依據。
    自構成要件具體規範之形象,可將構成要件所揭示出來之犯罪形象,展開類型化之區分,如此分類作用,並非表示一個構成要件之形式,僅適用單一犯罪類型之分類,反而係在說明,對於犯罪類型之形成與條件要求之共通性關係做一個理解。換言之,各種分類之方式,是從犯罪形成之不同角度,作不同屬性之分類,一個構成要件,因其觀察角度之不同,可以有多面向性之類型化概念。
    於犯罪類型之分類上,各組犯罪類型之區分皆有其實證上之意義存在,區分諸多犯罪類型之目的,係為使吾人對於個別犯罪之構成要件自不同之面向而有更清楚之認識,得以從不同之角度切入觀察,據此所得出之分類結果,亦各有其實益存在。
    對於「結果犯、行為犯」此組犯罪類型,該如何區辨結果犯與行為犯,學理及實務判決皆未說明如何以一個具體明確之標準作區辨,因此本文提出可能可行之判斷方法,即自構成要件之層次進行判斷,並以「構成要件結果」為出發,分成三階段之檢驗。期能對於個別構成要件之犯罪屬性,透過「結果犯、行為犯」類型分析之理解,而精確掌握各個犯罪成立要件之涵意。

    The function and meaning of the Elements of Crime, in terms of theories of legal interpretation, are legal concepts classified by the facts of Legal Interests harming behavior. Which must be able to reflect classified characteristics from different structural relations in its objective image, so as to serve as an auxiliary cognition in understanding. The main purpose of distinguishing types of crimes in criminal law is to have an overall understanding of the elements of an individual crime and its effective scope through the understanding of such classifications. Additionally through the understanding it’s analysis, we can accurately know the meaning of the elements of each crime, and provide supplementary basis for those elements not provided in statutes of criminal law.

    The specifically regulatory image of the s can be used to classify the criminal image revealed by the same, the classification function does not mean a single form of Elements of Crime can only be applicable to one classification. Instead, it is to explain the common relationship between the formation of crime types and the requirements of elements. In other words, each way of classification is a classification of different attributes from different angles of crime formation, and every element can have multi-orientation concepts due to its different angles of observation.

    In terms of the classification of crime types, the distinction of each crime type has its empirical significance. The purpose of distinguishing various types of crimes is to make us have a clearer understanding of the elements of individual crime from different aspects. The classification results obtained from different perspectives have their own practical benefits.

    For how to distinguish such crime types of "Consequential Offenses and Conduct Crimes." Neither academic nor practical judgments have given an explanation regarding how to distinguish the abovesaid crimes by using a specific and clear standard. Therefore, this essay tries to suggest a feasible judgment method for the difficulties addressed above. That is, judged by the different phases of the and begin with “results of ”then have such results divided into three stages for further examination. Hoping through the understanding of the type analysis of "Consequential Offenses and Conduct Crimes", we can accurately grasp the meaning of the establishment elements of each crime.
    顯示於類別:[法律學系暨法律學研究所] 博碩士論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    index.html0KbHTML109檢視/開啟


    在CCUR中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋