English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 46965/50831 (92%)
造訪人次 : 12670172      線上人數 : 708
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    主頁登入上傳說明關於CCUR管理 到手機版


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/50928


    題名: 不同吸濕紗對針織布吸濕快乾性能研究
    The knitted fabric moisture absorbing and quick drying of different hygroscopic yarn
    作者: 陳吟璇
    貢獻者: 紡織產業碩士專班
    關鍵詞: 水纖維
    十字斷面紗
    八角斷面紗
    吸濕快乾
    Water-fiber
    Cross profiled yarn
    Octagonal profiled yarn
    Moisture Wicking Fabric
    日期: 2021
    上傳時間: 2023-02-15 10:23:26 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 隨著大眾對於吸濕快乾的要求,市面上產生了不同的加工方法來提升織物的吸濕排汗性能,如:異型斷面紗、織物親水柔軟劑加工、物組織結構改變等。本研究著重在織物規格固定時,使用不同種類的吸濕放濕紗,比較之間對於水分吸收跟乾燥的差異。透過 AATCC 197 紡織品垂直芯吸高度試驗、AATCC 79 紡織品吸水性試驗、AATCC 195 紡織品液體水分管理性能試驗及 AATCC201 織物乾燥速率試驗:加熱板法,利用實驗探討研究問題。從實驗結果得知,十字斷面紗在吸濕擴散及整體水分管理能力較優異,而水纖維圓形斷面紗與八角斷面紗在乾燥速率測試有較佳的表現。因十字斷面紗的斷面凹度較深,能容納較多的水分,使其在芯吸高度及擴散速率有優異的表現。而水纖維圓形斷面紗其附加之親水柔軟劑與八角斷面紗較淺的斷面凹度雖在吸濕效果略差於十字斷面紗,但在乾燥速率卻能有較佳的表現。以理論上來說八角斷面紗因凹槽較多,吸濕效果應為最佳,應有最佳的人體舒適感。但從實驗結果得知,紗線吸水效果需其紗線能附載較多水分,紗線即使含有較多的凹槽若凹痕不明顯反而會使整體水分管理能力下降。
    With the public's requirements for moisture absorption and quick drying, different processing methods have been produced on the market to improve the moisture absorption and perspiration performance of fabrics, such as: special-shaped cross-veil, fabric hydrophilic softener processing, fabric structure change, etc. This research focuses on the use of different types of moisture-absorbing and moisture-releasing yarns when the fabric specifications are fixed, and comparing the differences between moisture absorption and drying. Through AATCC 197, AATCC 79, AATCC 195 and AATCC 201, use experiments to explore research issues. From the experimental results, it is known that the cross profiled yarn has excellent moisture absorption and diffusion and overall moisture management capabilities, while the water-fiber yarn and octagonal profiled yarn have better performance in the drying rate test. Because the cross profiled yarn has a deeper concavity, it can hold more water, so that it has excellent performance in wicking height and diffusion rate. The water-fiber yarn has the additional hydrophilic softener and the octagonal profiled yarn which has a relatively shallow cross-sectional concavity, although the moisture absorption effect is slightly worse than that of the cross profiled yarn, but it has better performance in the drying rate. In theory, the octagonal profiled yarn has more grooves, so the moisture absorption effect should be the best, and it should have the best human vi body comfort. However, it is known from the experimental results that the water absorption effect of the yarn requires that the yarn can carry more water. Even if the yarn contains more grooves, if the dents are not obvious, the overall water management ability will be reduced.
    顯示於類別:[紡織工程學系] 博碩士論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    index.html0KbHTML164檢視/開啟


    在CCUR中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋