《埤雅》為宋代仿雅之作，廣引文獻以訓釋名物為其特色之一，而徵引書籍古今、雅俗無所不兼，因陸佃曾參與編修《說文》，故《說文》亦為援引取材來源之一，本文即從《埤雅》中爬梳所引《說文》相關的一百零八個條目，將其與大徐本《說文》進行校對，藉以分析二者差異之處，並加以辯證，或正《埤雅》引用之失，或補《說文》所缺之處，並盼藉由探論陸佃說釋方法，以資重現並瞭解陸佃之字學觀念。
＂Pi Ya＂ is a work of imitation in the Song Dynasty. The widely cited literature is one of the characteristics of the exegesis of famous objects, and the quotation of books is both ancient and modern, and elegant and popular. Because Lu Dian once participated in the compilation of ＂Shuowen＂, so ＂Shuowen＂ is also Citing one of the sources, this article refers to 108 items related to Shuo Wen cited in ＂Yi Ya＂, and collates it with Da Xu Ben's Shuo Wen to analyze the differences between the two. And dialectically, or correct the loss of quotation of ＂Yi Ya＂, or make up for the lack of ＂Shuo Wen＂, and hope that by exploring Lu Dian's interpretation methods, he can reproduce and understand Lu Dian's concept of the word.
