從當事人意思自治論仲裁之保全程序

CCUR > College of Law > Department of Law & Graduate Institute of Law > thesis > Item 987654321/48523

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/48523

Title:	從當事人意思自治論仲裁之保全程序 On Provisional Measures by Arbitral Tribunal in the Light of Party Autonomy
Authors:	蔡惟鈞
Contributors:	法律學系
Keywords:	仲裁臨時措施當事人意思自治單方臨時措施初步命令緊急仲裁人程序
Date:	2020
Issue Date:	2020-09-02 11:18:44 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	伴隨國際經貿往來之日益頻繁，因商業慣例、文化經濟體制、政策規章等差異，所造成之投資貿易爭議時常可見。若能建立一套完善且良好之爭端解決機制，得使投資人於面對商業爭端時更具信心，亦降低投資貿易不確定風險。因此於國際經貿的發展上，爭端解決機制之重要性不可言喻。近年來，於眾多商事爭端解決機制中，受到國際商事爭端當事人所重視者，即是具有迅速性、專業性、程序選擇之自由性、保密性與可執行性等優點的仲裁。所謂之仲裁制度，係透過當事人間相互約定，將爭端提交於值得信賴之第三人（仲裁人）判斷，作為解決爭端之途徑。而仲裁制度中，訂有仲裁協議之爭端當事人於爭議交付仲裁前或仲裁程序進行中，就是否肯定當事人得賦予仲裁庭核准具有保全性質暫時措施之權限，隨著仲裁制度之發展有著不同之變化。本研究之目的，即係從當事人意思自治與仲裁間之關係出發，試圖尋找我國現行《仲裁法》下，就仲裁保全程序之解釋，是否仍具有不同之可能，並且就我國仲裁制度中保全程序之未來發展及立法修正提出規劃。 Obtaining provisional measures swiftly is paramount importance for parties in arbitration. Whether a provisional measure of protection is an arbitral award is a hotly debated question. Traditionally, requests for provisional measures have been a construct of courts. However, re-questing provisional measures from an arbitrator are increasingly being. There is a great debate within the international community as to the recommend, legality and enforceability of suggestion. This article will proceed to analyze the disadvantages, problems and the alleged ad-vantages of provisional measures from an arbitrator application in ar-bitration.
Appears in Collections:	[Department of Law & Graduate Institute of Law ] thesis

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
index.html		0Kb	HTML	215	View/Open

View Licence

Loading...