文化大學機構典藏 CCUR:Item 987654321/48371
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 47249/51115 (92%)
造访人次 : 14213888      在线人数 : 589
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻
    主页 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上传 ‧ 说明 ‧ 关于CCUR ‧ 管理 到手机版


    jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/48371


    题名: 苦味漱口對划船選手衝刺運動表現與神經肌肉功能的影響
    Effect of Bitter Solution Mouth Rinse on the Competitive Rowers Sprinting Performance and Neuromuscular Function
    作者: 楊舜翔
    贡献者: 體育學系運動教練碩博士班
    关键词: 奎寧
    肌電圖
    測功儀
    Quinine
    Electromyography
    Ergometer
    日期: 2020
    上传时间: 2020-08-13 15:24:57 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 目的：本研究旨於探討苦味劑漱口對單次無氧動力測驗對運動表現以及肌肉電訊號造成之影響。方法：本研究以12名男性優秀划船選手為研究對象 (年齡，17.6 ± 1.0歲；身高，174.3 ± 5.1公分；體重，73.2 ± 7.3公斤)。以重複量數、隨機平衡次序讓所有受試者分別接受三種不同的實驗處理，包括苦味劑漱口處理 (2mmol/L, BSRI)、碳水化合物漱口處理 (6.4%, CSRI) 以及不漱口處理 (CON)，每次實驗處理後，會進行5分鐘的標準化熱身，而後進行單次30秒溫蓋特衝刺。結果：30秒溫蓋特衝刺測驗的動力學指標中，總距離 (BSRI vs. CSRI vs. CON, 175.04 ± 8.67 m vs. 173.63 ± 8.00 m vs. 175.58 ± 7.49 m)、峰值功率 (BSRI vs. CSRI vs. CON, 650.25 ± 98.68 Watts vs. 646.58 ± 97.69 Watts vs. 667.36 ± 93.25 Watts)、動力遞減率 (BSRI vs. CSRI vs. CON, 0.16 ± 0.05 vs. 0.18 ± 0.09 vs. 0.23 ± 0.25) 三種不同實驗處理之間皆無顯著差異 (p > .05)。以肌電圖分析，發現BSRI平均頻率的股內側肌 (BSRI vs. CSRI vs. CON, 84.99 ± 12.17 Hz vs. 85.64 ± 11.09 Hz vs. 73.80 ± 18.18 Hz) 與中位頻率的肱三頭肌 (BSRI vs. CSRI vs. CON, 9.30 ± 1.39 Hz vs. 8.86 ± 1.32 Hz vs. 8.32 ± 1.25 Hz) 均顯著高於CON組 (p < .05)，其餘不同處理之間皆無顯著差異。結論：無論是苦味溶液漱口亦或者是碳水化合物溶液漱口皆無法有效提升划船選手單次衝刺運動之運動表現，但有可能改變其神經肌肉功能。
    Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of bitter solution mouth rinse on a single anaerobic test and muscle electrical signals. Method: Twelve male rowers were recruited (age, 17.6 ± 1.0 years ; height, 174.3 ± 5.1 cm ; weight, 73.2 ± 7.3 kg). Subjects were asked to participating three different experimental treatments in the repeated measures, counter balance, including bitter solution mouth rinse treatment (2mmol/L, BSRI), carbohydrate solution mouth rinse treatment (6.4%, CSRI), and no mouth rinse treatment (CON). After each experimental treatment, a standardized warm-up for 5 minutes is performed, followed by a single 30-second Wingate sprint test. Result: In the dynamic index of the 30-second Wingate sprint test, the total distance (BSRI vs. CSRI vs. CON, 175.04 ± 8.67 m vs. 173.63 ± 8.00 m vs. 175.58 ± 7.49 m), peak power ( BSRI vs. CSRI vs. CON, 650.25 ± 98.68 Watts vs. 646.58 ± 97.69 Watts vs. 667.36 ± 93.25 Watts), power decline rate (BSRI vs. CSRI vs. CON, 0.16 ± 0.05 vs. 0.18 ± 0.09 vs. 0.23 ± 0.25) there was no significant difference between three different treatments (p > .05). Based on EMG analysis, the BSRI mean power frequency on vastus medialis (BSRI vs. CSRI vs. CON, 84.99 ± 12.17 Hz vs. 85.64 ± 11.09 Hz vs. 73.80 ± 18.18 Hz) and the median frequency of the triceps brachii (BSRI vs. CSRI vs. CON, 9.30 ± 1.39 Hz vs. 8.86 ± 1.32 Hz vs. 8.32 ± 1.25 Hz) was significantly higher than the CON (p < .05), and there was no significant difference between different treatments. Conclusion: The results of the study found that neither bitter solution rinse or carbohydrate solution rinse might not improve the performance of rowers during a single sprint, but may change their neuromuscular function.
    显示于类别:[運動教練研究所] 博碩士論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    index.html0KbHTML127检视/开启


    检视Licence

    在CCUR中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈