摘要: | 我國立法院於2019年三讀通過《都市更新條例修正案》,用以落實都市更新政策,都市更新儼然成為政府當前施政的首重指標。面對台灣住宅日益老舊和人口高齡化的問題,無障礙空間及安全友善的公共空間需求日益擴大,政府為提升都市景觀與區域整合願景,以三大面向:「健全重要機制」、「解決實務困境」及「強化程序正義」提出都市更新的解決方案。故本研究探討未來都市更新如何在意見分歧下,整合關係人之間共同目標及利益為本篇宗旨。
然而,落實都市更新政策的關鍵因素在於關係人認知差異,認知差異導致都市更新時程延宕,程序的完整是對民眾權益最好的保障,有助於提升都市更新效率。為創造都市更新的雙贏局面,實施都市更新及重建都市機能已是當務之急。本研究方法,首先探討都市更新實施現況和都市更新面臨的困境,透過深度訪談了解公部門、私部門及所有權人在都更過程的認知差異,接著輔以資料分析結果,提出如何在都更過程中加速進行解決方案。
本研究透過文獻分析、深度訪談,發現現行都更的細項十分複雜,雖然政府修法提出多項條文以促成都更的進行,卻無法如期加速都市更新進展,經本研究探討建議方案如下:1、制定修法明確透明,以增加關係人的信賴與共識;2、都更流程需化繁為簡,減少爭議;3、建立資訊交流平台產生共識;4、老舊建物應以建造年限制定重建期限,給予獎勵增加誘因;及5、針對無法達成的爭議點設置相關調解法庭,以利都更持續進行。
都市更新的議題討論多年,其困難點是人與環境的因素、解決爭議的方式和關係人之間的互信。然而都更過程本就是衝突、協調、達成互信的循環過程,若能用數據及制定明確法令縮短彼此認知差異,讓都市更新重燃希望,將成為促進國家建設與都市發展的里程碑。
In 2019, the Legislative Yuan of the R.O.C. passed the readings of the Amendment to the Urban Renewal Act to implement the urban renewal policies. Urban renewal has become the key indicator of the current policy implementation of the government. With issues of old residences and the aging population in Taiwan, the demand for bar-rier-free space, safe, and friendly public spaces has been increasing. To improve the prospect of urban view and regional integration, the government proposed the solutions for urban generation based on three aspects, including “optimize material systems,” “solve practical difficulties,” and “reinforce procedural justice.” Therefore, the pur-pose of the study is to explore how to integrate the joint objectives and interests of stakeholders with differences in opinions.
However, the crucial factor in realizing policies on urban renewal is the cognitive differences between stakeholders. Cognitive differences result in the schedule delay for urban renewal. A comprehensive procedure is the best protection to citizens’ interests, facilitating the efficiency of urban renewal. To create a win-win situation for urban renewal, both the implementation of urban renewal as well as the rebuilding of urban functions has become imminent. In view of the method, the study initially explored the current state of urban renewal implementation and the difficulties faced by urban re-newal, understood the cognitive differences between the public sector, the private sec-tor, and the owners during the course of urban renewal through in-depth interviews, and analyzed the results with supporting data, and proposed a solution for the accelera-tion of urban renewal.
Through literature review and in-depth interviews, the study found the extreme complexity of items under urban renewal. Even though the government has amended the law and provided multiple provisions to facilitate the process of urban renewal, the development of urban renewal failed to be accelerated as expected. The study recom-mends the following after its exploration: 1. Establish laws and ensure transparency to improve the trust and mutual consensus between stakeholders; 2. Simplify the proce-dures for urban renewal to minimize disputes; 3. Establish an information exchange platform to manifest the mutual consensus; 4. A rebuilding time shall be set based on the building year of old buildings, and shall provide rewards as incentives; 5. Set up relevant mediation court for the issues of disputes that cannot reach consensus to facil-itate the continuation of urban renewal.
The issue of urban renewal has been under discussion for years, which faces the dif-ficulties regarding factors of humans and the environment, methods to solve disputes, and the mutual trust between stakeholders. However, the process of urban renewal is a cycle of conflict, negotiation, and mutual trust; where the cognitive differences may be minimized through the use of data and the establishment of clear laws and regulations; it may raise hope for urban renewal and become a milestone for facilitating the nation-al construction and urban development. |