An Evaluation of Krashen's Distinction between Acquisition and Learning

文化大學機構典藏 CCUR > 國際暨外語學院 > 國際暨外語學院 > 學報-華岡外語學報 > Item 987654321/46410

jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/46410

题名:	An Evaluation of Krashen's Distinction between Acquisition and Learning 評柯拉申氏之「習得與學習說」
作者:	陳建宇
贡献者:	英文系
关键词:	語言教學柯拉申學習習得 Krashen Learning Acquisition
日期:	1998-05
上传时间:	2020-04-29 10:29:11 (UTC+8)
摘要:	柯拉申（Krashen）主張：學習（learning）不能轉化為習得（acquisition）。在其 < 自然教學法 > （ The Natural Approach ）一書中，提出不少的教學活動，著重於給予學生充分的語言資料輸入（ comprehensible input ），以確保語言的習得。柯氏似乎特別強調自然溝通經驗在語言學習中的角色，而偏廢了文法教學的重要性。就語言習得理論而言，他的觀點雖不難理解，卻也引來了不少批評的聲浪。究竟他的習得與學習說為何？何以招致各方的批評？其他學者的看法如何？我們應如何看待其理論？本文將逐一闡述之。 Krashen claims that learning can not become acquisition. In The Natural Approach he suggests a wide variety of classroom activities centering on providing sufficient comprehensible input in order to assure the students' acquisition of the target language. He seems to emphasize particularly the role of natural communication experience in second language learning and to marginalize explicit grammar teaching. Krashen's position, in the light of second language acquisition theory comprehensible as that may be, has received a great deal of criticism, especially the Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis which dichotomizes the second language learning process into two separately operating systems: the acquired system and learned system. What does the Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis deal with? Why does it raise so many controversial issues? How do other linguists or psychologists treat these issues? How should we view these issues? This paper attempts to answer these questions.
關聯:	華岡外語學報 5 民87.05 頁239-253
显示于类别:	[國際暨外語學院] 學報-華岡外語學報

文件中的档案:

档案	描述	大小	格式	浏览次数
index.html		0Kb	HTML	108	检视/开启

检视Licence

在CCUR中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.

数据加载中.....