論安樂死-病人自主權利相關法制之研究

文化大學機構典藏 CCUR > 社會科學院 > 國家發展與與中國大陸研究所碩博士班 > 博碩士論文 > Item 987654321/45580

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/45580

Title:	論安樂死-病人自主權利相關法制之研究 Euthanasia Research on Legal Systems Related to Patients' Autonomy
Authors:	呂昭芬
Contributors:	國家發展與中國大陸研究所博士班
Keywords:	安樂死人性尊嚴病人自主權利法
Date:	2019
Issue Date:	2020-01-06 13:12:47 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	2016年1月6日我國正式立法通過《病人自主權利法》，成為亞洲第一部病人自主權利之專法，本論文以該法案為研究的背景素材，希冀就此研究，能提供國內醫事人員於臨床施行時確切的作為準則，及其後續修法建議，分章架構如下：第一章為緒論，包含研究背景與目的、研究方法、研究範圍與限制及文獻檢閱。第二章探討安樂死立法保障的探討，首先論述安樂死之定義與種類，就人性尊嚴導引出安樂死之基本內涵以展開介紹，並探討生命權的保障意義及範圍，最後對安樂死與生命權之調和進行分析。第三章則對國外安樂死相關法案進行介紹，為探討安樂死在我國推動之可行性，有必要進行國際趨勢及先進國家相關法規進行比較及歸納，與第二章結論進行考察相互印證並試行提出建議。第四章係針對前所論及之問題，提出我國有關安樂死合法化的辯證並提出因應之道。第五章以現從事臨床安寧照護醫事人員及法律專家學者為訪談對象，針對病人自主權利法於實務施行發現之衝突問題進行深度訪談進行分析及檢討。第六章藉由醫療自主權之反思及安寧療護之實踐，由本土文化視角面對安樂死立法契機，探討安樂死立法未來展望。經由上述各章節依次介紹及研究討論後，最終獲致第七章之結論，同時提出對於我國病人自主權利法之修法建議。 On January 6, 2016, Taiwan formally passed the "Patient Autonomy Rights Act", which became the first law on patient autonomy in Asia. This thesis uses this bill as the background material for research. It is hoped that this research can provide domestic medical personnel guidence if and when it is implemented clinically. It is to be used as a guideline and for follow-up recommendations. The chapter structure is as follows: The first chapter is the introduction, including research background and purpose, research method, research scope and limitation, and literature review. The second chapter discusses the protection of euthanasia legislation. First, it discusses the definition and types of euthanasia, introduces the basic definition of euthanasia in terms of human dignity, introduces the meaning and scope of the right to life, and finally reconciles euthanasia and the right to life. The third chapter introduces foreign euthanasia-related laws. In order to explore the feasibility of promoting medical autonomy in China, it is necessary to compare and summarize international trends and relevant laws and regulations of advanced countries. It also makes recommendations on how euthanasia may be implemented a trial basis. The fourth chapter is based on the issues discussed above, and puts forward the dialectics of euthanasia in Taiwan and the corresponding solutions. The fifth chapter uses in-depth clinical interviews with medical staff, legal experts, and scholars as interviewees to analyze and review in-depth interviews on conflicts found in the practice of the patient's autonomous rights law. Chapter VI discusses the future prospects of euthanasia legislation from the perspective of local culture through the reflection of medical autonomy and the practice of palliative care. After introducing and researching each chapter in turn, the conclusion is reached in Chapter VII. At the same time, suggestions for amending the patient's autonomy law in China were put forward.
Appears in Collections:	[國家發展與與中國大陸研究所碩博士班] 博碩士論文

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
index.html		0Kb	HTML	285	View/Open

View Licence

Loading...