人類為了存活而透過日常互動的過程，學習如何適應生活環境並與群體共存，藉由經驗的學習而認知危害社會存活之惡事。
最早的人類生活可追溯至距今甚久之遠古時代，據史料記載，目前所被發現世界上最早的刑法規範，約莫出現於西元前1800年，而用以檢驗犯罪成立之犯罪階層體系則遲至西元1890年始見雛形。顯見，遠在當今實定法與犯罪階層體系出現以前，犯罪本體之惡事早已實存，且係人類社會進化圖存歷程上的必然現象。
據上可知，刑法規範以及犯罪階層體系，並無法創造或重塑犯罪本體之惡事，斯二者僅為協助人類昭告社會中何類行為係屬生活中所評價之犯罪，從而，其內容物自不得悖離社會人民所形塑之惡事態樣，即犯罪之本體。
承此，本文不禁質疑的是，面對出自捍衛人類社會存活之意識，從而於外所為之防衛行為，果真係為社會生活中之惡事嗎？其所對應之刑法第23條規定又是否無疑？
本文將透過對於人類社會生活歷史之追溯，探索人類行為意識之心路歷程，抽絲剝繭地尋覓罪之形塑過程，以還原惡事樣貌，進而藉由釐清「人類如何透過大腦運作而學習認知生活經驗下之惡事」，重新構成「不法意識」之內涵。
除了釐清犯罪本體之樣貌外，並從中證得並闡明過當防衛之行為並不具犯罪之實質內涵，繼之，就刑法第23條但書規定，提出刪廢見解之論述。
In order to survive, humans learn how to adapt to the living environment with the group, and cognitive to jeopardize public security by experiences learning. The earliest human life can be traced back tens of millions of years ago, but the earliest criminal law norms be found in the world were about 1800 BC, and ”Die Lehre vom Verbrechen od. Verbrechenslehre” which to check the establishment of a crime was about 1890 AD. Obviously, the Originals of Crime before the legal standard and ”Die Lehre vom Verbrechen od. Verbrechenslehre”, and it is inevitable about the evolution of human society.
The criminal law norms and ”Die Lehre vom Verbrechen od. Verbrechenslehre”, which is assit human to post the crime be estimated for society and cannot be create or reconstruct the Originals of Crime. Therefore, the Originals of Crime is not depart from the Evils Deeds shaped by human.
Is it the Evil Deeds which that facing the act of human living from for defending the survival of society in life? Is the corresponding Article 23 of the Criminal Law doubtful?
Through the retracing of human history and the searching of human awareness to look for the process of the crime to return to the original condition of the Evil Deeds in the article and then to clarify how human to learn the Evil Deeds under experience in life by the functioning of the brain to create the meaning for the Consciousness Of Wrongfulness. In addition to clarify the appearance of the Originals of Crime, explanation for the Excessive Defense is not the appearance of the Originals of Crime. With regard to Article 23 of the Criminal Law, to propose an opinion of repeal.
