法律及其帶出制度之成敗，在於立法者對於所欲規範客體之認知程度，以及執法者是否適切地解讀該法之立法意旨與目的；就政府資訊公開法而言，其立法目的自三方匯集，原應形成一個穩固的三角形，惟實務上多半側重知的權利之討論，忽略了資訊公平利用與民主原則實現之立法目的，使得適用本法時、對於立法目的之解釋輕重失衡，導致後來執法者面對本法與其他法律之適用衝突時，產生錯誤理解與解釋盲點，如是衝突疑義亦將與現今開放政府之政策導向誘發互斥，相關資訊法制如資通安全管理法與個人資料保護法皆有影響，不可不慎。
是此，本文就政府資訊公開法之根本談起，討論政府資訊公開請求權之基礎，並觀察外國法制之發展與機制建立，回頭審視我國立法目的之設定與適用時之解釋完整性；其次，藉由我國實務案例，逐步檢視並識別法務部及各級法院對於政府資訊公開法制之認事用法情況與適用缺失，從而個別提出排除適用以及豁免公開條款之修正建議，復參考歐盟個資保護規則之資訊評估機制，嘗試將其考量因子融入我國現行法規範之操作模式，並進一步增加制度失靈風險與資訊可評性之參考因素，一邊導正現行實務運作之問題、一邊對於豁免公開提供另一角度之思考點；最後提出獨立監督機關之可能性及其雛形，期成果得提供我國未來修法方向之參考。
The success of a law and its legal system depends on the awareness of legislator about applied object and the appropriate application of enforcement about its legislative intention and purpose; To the Freedom of Government Information Law, its purpose was consolidating with three different orientations, and it originally should be a stable triangle, however the practical workers are often focusing on the discussion of ‘right to know’, then neglecting the fairly utilization of information and the achievement of democratic principle. Since the unbalance explanation have made that vague structure of those three legislator purposes, it also leading the misunderstanding and blind spots to juridical practitioner while they are dealing with the conflicts of other laws, especially in the orientation of the policy of Open Government, those conflicting questions will trigger an mutual exclusion and interacted affections between the policy and relevant laws, such as Cyber Security Management Act and Personal Information Protection Act.
Therefore, this dissertation would be started by the legal foundation of the Freedom of Government Information Law, observing the differences of development and establishment between the local and foreign legal system for reviewing our integrity in legislator purposes and its interpretation. Second, recognizing the defects of our legal system and applications by gradually inspecting the circumstances of law application from Ministry of justice and each court, afterward provide the advices for exclusion applied and the restrictions on publication of government information separately. In addition to research for the restrictions, consulting the information assessment mechanism which has built by General Data Protection Regulation, essay to assimilate the considerations into our local operation structure. Further integrating the risk of system failure and the feasibility of public commentary for being another way to think the considerations about the restrictions on the Freedom of Government Information. Final, discussing and also suggest the possibility and a miniature on the establishment of an independent supervisory authority, in hope to provide some reference to the future legal amending direction in Taiwan.
