兩岸醫療糾紛之處理法制比較－以訴訟上舉證責任為中心

文化大學機構典藏 CCUR > 法學院 > 法律學系暨法律學研究所 > 學報-華岡法粹 > Item 987654321/44494

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/44494

Title:	兩岸醫療糾紛之處理法制比較－以訴訟上舉證責任為中心 Study of Medical Disputes between Taiwan and China: Focusing on Burden of Proof in Litigation
Authors:	謝榮堂
Contributors:	法律系
Keywords:	醫師法定診療義務疏失過失舉證責任舉證責任轉換舉證責任減輕證明妨礙表見證明證明度降低舉證責任反置事實說明自己法則重大醫療瑕疵原則可完全控制之危險原則 Physician's Statutory Duties Missed Fault Burden of Proof Burden of Proof Conversion
Date:	2018-12-01
Issue Date:	2019-06-11 10:20:12 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	病人或其家屬對於醫療不良結果或期待落差等等因素，對醫師或醫院提起訴訟請求賠償損害，依據不同訴訟種類與程序，就有關醫療之疏失、醫師或醫院或其履行輔助人相關過失，以及醫療瑕疵與損害間之因果關係等三項構成要件，而有不同舉證責任分攤。訴訟原則上，主要應該由原告為之，由於病人與醫師或醫院間，專業與資訊不對等，訴訟實務應儘量合理正當分配舉證責任，尤其應適度減輕及合理轉換原告舉證負擔。蓋病人可能是因為醫師或醫院之重大醫療疏失而受有損害，於此情形下，則適用舉證責任轉換，但僅限於民事訴訟，刑事訴訟無此問題。 A patient or his family members mayhave filefiled a lawsuit against the doctor or hospital for damages due to, such as unexpected medical results or unsatisfied expectationsexpectation of drop. The three constitutive elements for such litigation that determine the appointed burden of proof include, theaccording to different litigation types of litigation and procedures, negligence in relation to the medical treatment, the fault of the doctor or the hospital or its performing contractual assistant, and the causal relationship between medical fault and damages. There are three constitutive elements, such as the causal relationship between medical expenses and damage, and there are different burdens of proof. As a general rule in litigationIn principle, the plaintiff should have the burden of proofbe responsible for this. Bbecause the professional and informationeducation and experience are not equal between the patient and the doctor or the hospital, and the litigation practice should allocate the burden of proof as reasonable and reasonable as possible. In particular, the burden of the plaintiff's burden of proof should be moderately reduced and reasonably convertedshifted. WhenCovering the patient's damages is may be caused by a major substantial medical malpractice of the doctor or hospital. In this case, the conversion shift of the burden of proof is applicable. However, but it is limited only applicable to civil and not to criminal litigations. lawsuits. Criminal proceedings do not have this problem.
關聯:	華岡法粹； 65期 (2018 / 12 / 01) ， P41 - 72
显示于类别:	[法律學系暨法律學研究所] 學報-華岡法粹

文件中的档案:

档案	描述	大小	格式	浏览次数
index.html		0Kb	HTML	174	检视/开启

检视Licence

在CCUR中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.

Loading...