文化大學機構典藏 CCUR:Item 987654321/44413
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 47249/51115 (92%)
Visitors : 14252650      Online Users : 560
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/44413


    Title: 關鍵四十八小時之兩岸過勞猝死認定差異-以醫學角度論其合理性
    Key to forty-eight hours - Comparative Study of Taiwan and China 's karoshi identified-Use a medical point of view to discuss whether it is reasonable
    Authors: 郭俊杰 (KUO,CHUN-CHIEH)
    Contributors: 法律學系碩士在職專班
    Keywords: 過勞猝死
    工傷保險條例15-1
    腦死判定準則
    職業安全衛生法
    職業促發腦血管及心臟疾病之認定參考指引
    Death from overwork
    Work injury insurance regulations 15-1
    Brain death criterion
    Occupational safety and health act
    Reference guidelines for the identification of occupational cerebrovascular and heart diseases
    Date: 2018
    Issue Date: 2019-05-31 14:11:02 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 過勞一直是職業安全與衛生法規中重點強調,但卻無法杜絕爭議的議題,其原因出在於過勞並非是一法律名詞,也非醫學疾病,更不是能用文字清楚且清楚的定義。它是一個社會學的現象,肇因起於醫學上的各種疾病交互作用,生理機轉加以心理上的精神負荷,多重因素導致下的社會名詞。筆者畢業於慈濟大學護理學系,之後就讀文化大學法律所,因此本篇文章希望能以醫學的角度切入過勞議題,探究法律定義上的合理性是否切進醫學上的病程演進,以評價法規的適切性。同時,文末以醫學法規中的死亡定義,和過勞的死亡加以比較,提出一些淺見和拙論,期許拋磚引玉,吸引更多學者一起探究過勞猝死認定之合理性,以架構出安全衛生的勞動市場,降低過勞猝死之認定爭議,讓死者已矣,生者安寧。
    Overwork has always been a term commonly mentioned in occupational safety and health regulations, but it cannot eliminate issues of controversy. The reason is that overwork is not a legal term, nor is it a medical condition, and it is even less clear and clear definition. It is a sociological phenomenon. Because of the interaction of various diseases in medicine, the psychiatric physiological mental workload, multiple factors lead to the next social noun. This article hopes to enter into the issue of overwork from a medical point of view, to explore whether the rationality of the definition of the law is cutting into the course of medical development, in order to evaluate the appropriateness of laws and regulations. At the end of the paper, the definition of death in medical regulations is compared with the death from overwork, and some ideas are put forward. It is hoped that more scholars will explore the rationality of the death judgment of labor death to construct a safe and hygienic labor market and reduce the recognition of overwork and death dispute.
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Law & Graduate Institute of Law ] thesis

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML73View/Open


    All items in CCUR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback