背景：肌內效貼布以不同的貼紮，有預防運動損傷、提高運動表現與矯正等功能。至今，諸多廠商製作類似性能的貼布，均有相似性質與功能。因此，值得探討比較不同貼布對疲勞運動之影響。目的：本研究目的主要探討不同運動貼布對下肢疲勞運動之影響。方法：招募15名19至25歲具運動專項之男性大學生為受試者；採重複量數、隨機分配方式將受試者分成肌內效貼布組、洛克貼布組、安慰劑組 (以肌內效貼布進行無張力貼紮) 與不貼紮組 (控制組) 。分別測量其右腿後腱肌群之肌肉厚度、羽狀肌角度、最大向心及離心肌力之各時間點 (疲勞運動前、運動後，及運動後第一、二、三天) 的變化。統計方式採混合設計二因子變異數分析，顯著差異水準設為α=.05。結果：不同貼布組別分別在介入疲勞運動後，在腿後腱肌群之肌肉厚度與最大離心收縮並無顯著差異。在羽狀肌角度，所有組別均在第三天有顯著差異 (F=2.990；p<.05) ；最大向心肌力表現，貼紮組均能比不貼紮更快回復腿後腱肌之最大向心肌力表現，安慰組 (p =0.001) > 洛克貼布組 (p =0.010) > 肌貼組 (p=0.011) 。結論：利用不同運動貼紮介入反覆下肢疲勞運動，其效益如下：一、促使疲勞肌群恢復羽狀肌角度至原始生理狀態；二、貼紮組均比不貼紮組更快提升腿後腱肌之最大向心肌力表現；三、肌內效貼布促進恢復的效果比洛克貼布為佳。
Background: Different taping methods of kinesio tape can help to prevent the rate of sports injuries, enhance sports performance and movement correction. Recently, different patterns of tape were developed in their own function. In the light of this information, the application and comparison with different types of kinesio tape in sports recovery were worth to investigate. Purpose: The aim of this study was to explore the effects of different tapes on the fatigue after accepting lower extremity exercises (LEE). Method: 15 of 19 to 25 years old collegiate male participants were recruited and as well as randomly distributed into kinesio tape group (KT), ROCKTAPE group (RK), placebo group (used KT to tape without tension, PB) and non-taping group (control group, CG) with repeated-measures design. Participants performed LEE for muscle fatigued induction. The statistic method was used two-way ANOVA to analyze the muscle thickness (MT), the angle of pennation (AP), maximum eccentric contraction, and maximum concentric strength of the hamstring muscles. The significance level was set α=.05. Results: After testing, MT had no significant correlation with the maximum eccentric contraction. For AP, all groups showed a significant difference at the third day (F=2.990; p<.05). Comparing to CG, all taping groups had a better recovery in the maximum concentric strength performance; PB (p =0.001) > RK (p =0.010) > KT (p=0.011). Conclusion: After different sport tapings intervened to the repeated lower extremity exercises, the effects were as follows: 1) KT could help AP in fatigued muscle groups to recover to original state. 2) Comparing to the CG, taping groups had a better performance in maximum concentric strength. 3) Contrast to RK, KT had a better recovery effect.
