文化大學機構典藏 CCUR:Item 987654321/44091
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 47249/51115 (92%)
Visitors : 14199233      Online Users : 567
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/44091


    Title: 犯罪被害人與加害人調解制度在少年司法實施之可行性研究
    A Study of the Plausibility of the Victim-Offender Mediation in Juvenile Justice System
    Authors: 葉盈采 (YEH,YING-TSAI)
    Contributors: 青少年兒童福利碩士學位學程
    Keywords: 少年事件
    犯罪被害人
    犯罪加害人
    調解
    少年犯罪被害人與加害人調解制度
    juveniles、victims
    juvenile offenders
    mediation
    victims and offender mediation system
    Date: 2018
    Issue Date: 2019-05-10 14:00:17 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本論文試圖探討犯罪被害人與加害人調解制度之可行性研究。研究方法使用深入訪談法訪談法官2人,學者專家3人,主任調保官2人,合計7人,以探討犯罪被害人與加害人調解制度之可行性研究的評估結果。主要研究結果,計有下列數項:
    1.雖同具調解的功能,但目的之不同,造就不同制度的操作過程。
    2.犯罪被害人與加害人調解制度雖異於傳統調解制度,但實踐上財物的賠償仍被視為調解的重要因素。
    3.將犯罪被害人與加害人調解制度先行於司法之前,有助於調解的成效。
    4.促進者的專業是犯罪被害人與加害人調解制度的關鍵。
    5.少年調查官是最適合的評估者。
    6.修法可解決試行實施的困難。
    7.資源的整合的必要性。
    最後,本論文依據上述研究結果,提出下列六項的建議,包括:
    1. 犯罪被害人與加害人調解制度是可行的,修法能落實制度的推展。
    2. 教育及推廣的重要。
    3. 促進者的訓練與專業需加強及被肯定。
    4. 資源的統整能提高司法的效率及人民的信任。
    5. 政府需投入資源,確實執行整合及分配。

    This study aims to explore the plausibility of the mediation system between victims and juvenile offenders. In-depth interviews were conducted with 2 judges, 3 expert scholars, and 2 probation officers, to evaluate whether the victim-offender mediation (VOM) system is plausible. The main findings include the following:
    1. Although mediation serves the same function, the operation processes tend to be different due to different purposes of different types of cases.
    2. Although VOM is different from the traditional mediation system, in practice compensation is still regarded as an important factor in mediation.
    3. Placing VOM before the judiciary process, can enhance the effectiveness of mediation.
    4. The professionalism of the facilitators in mediation is the key for the success of VOM.
    5. The probation officer is the most suitable to serve as the evaluator.
    6. Amendments in related laws can reduce the difficulties of the implementation of VOM system.
    7. The integration of different resources is needed.
    Finally, based on the research results, the following suggestions are proposed.
    1. Victim-offender mediation is plausible in juvenile justice system.To implement the VOM system, amendments in laws are needed.
    2. Related education and promotion for VOM is essential.
    3. Training that strengthens facilitators’ professional skills is needed.
    4. Integration of resources can improve the efficiency of justice system and enchance the trust of the public.
    5. The government needs to integrate different resources and appropriately allocate the resources.
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Social Welfare ] thesis

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML180View/Open


    All items in CCUR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback