文化大學機構典藏 CCUR:Item 987654321/41410
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 46962/50828 (92%)
造访人次 : 12454021      在线人数 : 795
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧:
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号",以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻,建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段,可获得较完整数据
  • 进阶搜寻
    主页登入上传说明关于CCUR管理 到手机版


    jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/41410


    题名: 學生擬題教學對情意學習成效及學業成就影響之後設分析
    Effects of the Problem Posing Strategies of Students on Affective Learning Outcomes and Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis
    作者: 廖遠光
    張澄清
    贡献者: 師培
    关键词: 出題
    後設分析
    情意學習成效
    學業成就
    擬題
    Academic achievement
    Affective learning outcome
    Meta-analysis
    Problem posing
    Question posing
    日期: 2016-09
    上传时间: 2018-12-13 14:54:17 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本研究應用後設分析法探討學生擬題教學對於提升情意及學業成就之效果,並試圖探討可能影響教學成效的變數。以擬題、出題、problem posing、problem generation、problem writing、problem formulation 為關鍵詞,至「臺灣博碩士論文」、「CETD 中文碩博士論文」、「臺灣期刊論文索引」及「CEPS 中文電子期刊」等資料庫檢索相關文獻,共蒐集擬題教學成效之實驗研究31 篇,可提供情意學習17 筆及學業成就34 筆之效果量,計有2,421 個樣本納入分析。研究結果顯示,學生擬題教學對於情意及學業成就具有正向效應,整體效果量分別為0.34 及0.57。意即對於情意及學業成就的提升,皆優於傳統講述式教學法,且對於學業成就的提升效果更佳。情意學習會受到「學科領域」、「教學者偏誤」、「擬題次數」及「網路擬題」等變數之調節作用而呈現差異;學業成就的調節變數則有「學習階段」、「學科領域」、「教學者偏誤」、「課程時數」及「分組學習」等。
    A meta-analysis was performed to synthesize existing research that investigated the effects of problem-posing strategies on the affective learning outcomes and academic achievement of students in Taiwan. We adopted problem posing, problem generation, problem writing, and problem formulation as keywords and gathered 31 studies (comprising 17 comparisons for the affective domain and 34 comparisons for academic achievement), converting their quantitative data to effect size (ES). The results demonstrated that problem posing strategies provided considerable benefits than traditional instruction did on students' affective learning outcomes (ES = 0.34) and academic achievement (ES = 0.57), and the larger positive effect sizes showed the benefit is greater on academic achievement. In addition, four moderator variables were selected for investigating affective learning outcomes and five moderator variables were selected for investigating academic achievement (including subject area, instructor bias, total number of courses, and cooperative learning), all of which had statistically significant impacts on the mean ES. Finally, the noteworthy suggestions and limitations of this study were discussed.
    關聯: 教育科學研究期刊 61:3 2016.09[民105.09] 頁1-42
    显示于类别:[師資培育中心 ] 期刊論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    index.html0KbHTML142检视/开启


    在CCUR中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈