文化大學機構典藏 CCUR:Item 987654321/41087
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 46962/50828 (92%)
Visitors : 12442029      Online Users : 640
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/41087


    Title: 市售拖鞋材料避震能力的比較
    Comparison of Shock Absorption Capacity for Outsole Material of Wholesale Slippers
    Authors: 林信良
    洪得明
    劉于詮
    徐偉庭
    Contributors: 運教所
    Keywords: 最大負荷率
    撞擊吸收能力
    撞擊高度
    力量峰值
    The max loading rate
    Shock adsorbing ability
    Impact height
    Peak force
    Date: 2009-09
    Issue Date: 2018-11-15 14:45:23 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: Purpose: This study was designed to evaluate the cushioning properties of four marketing slippers in different impact heights and compared with a running shoe with an air cushion. Method: Four types of slippers that were sold at the market were used to compare their shock absorbing ability (SAA) and offer references for purchasers. All shoes were placed on the shock absorbing ability test instrument (SAATI) for survey. According to the procedure, SAATI was adjusted at 3 heights (3cm, 4cm and 5cm) to impact the shoes. At each condition, the impact was done 6 times repeatedly and independent two-way ANOVA was used to compare SAA of those shoes. Results: The main findings of the study were as follows; i). The higher impact height increased the peak reaction force and the max loading rate. ii). The data of the peak reaction force and the max loading rate: shoe 2> shoe 1> shoe 3> shoe 4. iii). The data of shoe 1、3 and 4 were smaller than shoe 5. iv). Shoe 4 reduced 17-21% peak reaction force compared with shoe 5; shoe 3 reduced 10-13% peak reaction force compared with shoe 5. v). The material of shoe 1 was soft. After a long time used, the thickness of the slipper would be attenuated and the ability of cushioning would be decreased. Conclusion: Purchasers should choose the shoes with good shock absorbing ability to reduce the injuries because the different slipper could offer different shock absorbing ability.
    Relation: 大專體育學刊 11:3 2009.09[民98.09] 頁81-94
    Appears in Collections:[Graduate Institute of Sport Coaching Science ] journal articles

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML41View/Open


    All items in CCUR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback