我國刑事警察局執行跨境犯罪防制政策困境及解決途徑之研究：以4種犯罪類型為例

文化大學機構典藏 CCUR > 社會科學院 > 政治系暨政治學系碩博士班 > 博碩士論文 > Item 987654321/39839

jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/39839

题名:	我國刑事警察局執行跨境犯罪防制政策困境及解決途徑之研究：以4種犯罪類型為例 A Study of the Predicaments and Solutions on the Execution of Transregional Crime Prevention Policy by Criminal Investigation Bureau in Taiwan: 4 Types of Crime Survey
作者:	呂鴻進
贡献者:	政治學系
关键词:	跨境犯罪防制政策境外關係刑事管轄權境外協助偵查跨境犯罪嫌犯遣返 transregional crime prevention policy foreign relations criminal jurisdiction assistance in investigation abroad、 culprits’ repatriation from foreign countries
日期:	2017
上传时间:	2018-05-09 13:50:28 (UTC+8)
摘要:	為探究目前跨境犯罪嚴重程度；探求我國跨境犯罪防制政策如何被刑事警察局執行，執行過程中會產生哪些問題，有無有效解決途徑；探討我國刑事警察局與法務部調查局、外交部、行政院大陸委員會、國家安全局等政府部門在跨境犯罪問題上之合作與整合可能性；建構以我國刑事警察局為主體之跨境犯罪防制政策作為，並將之具體展現出來。因此，本文採用政策執行理論、全球治理的規範體系理論及系統理論等研究途徑，並輔以文獻分析、深度訪談及個案分析等研究方法來試圖探索我國刑事警察局執行跨境犯罪防制政策時所遭遇之境外關係、刑事管轄權、境外協助偵查、以及跨境犯罪嫌犯遣返等4項困境。藉此了解目前跨境犯罪防制政策制定可能產生之疏漏，俾進一步思考跨境犯罪防制政策變革之必要性與補救措施，從而建立防制跨境犯罪之具體可行模式。本研究主要發現計有下列數項：一、境外關係面向：1）兩岸政治角力為境外關係政策難以有效執行主因；2）應加強與各國執法單位交往，以建立實質聯繫管道；3）爭取國際刑警組織觀察員身分，俾運用該組織資源對抗跨境犯罪；4）打擊跨境犯罪經費宜編足，俾利境外關係政策順遂執行；5）應設法擴大部署警察聯絡官，以建構跨境犯罪全球防制網。二、刑事管轄權面向：1）國內法律政策不明確將影響對外主張刑事管轄權；2）刑事管轄權衝突與競合應依國際管轄權優先順序協商解決；3）我國刑事管轄權政策項目應設法納入共打犯罪協（定）議條文中，以明確規範各方應盡責任與義務。三、境外協助偵查面向：1）國際情資交流互惠合作為打擊跨境犯罪有效方式；2）警察對警察合作模式為打擊跨境犯罪具體良策；3）建立雙偵查主體模式，以有效解決境外取證證據能力認定問題；4）境外取證程序及證據能力認定標準宜制訂專法予以規範；5）跨境犯罪嫌犯串證問題可藉由科學辦案或偵訊技巧等方式來防範；6）對曾犯有跨境電信詐欺犯罪國人宜在兼顧人權與國家安全前提下，考量是否列冊管制一定年限內不得再出境，以有效降緩是類犯罪發生。四、跨境犯罪嫌犯遣返面向：1）國家安全會議為國內處理重大跨境犯罪最佳整合平臺；2）各駐外單位應捨棄本位主義及成見，遵從館長指揮，以獲取跨境犯罪嫌犯遣返最大效益；3）臺陸嫌犯各自遣返規定應明確納入兩岸共打及司法互助協議中；4）應修法提高國內刑責，俾有效降緩跨境電信詐欺集團犯罪發生率；5）符合境外犯罪當地國移民法規遣返措施為目前我國刑事警察局使用最廣且最有效之跨境犯罪嫌犯遣返策略。 For the purposes of probing the severity of current transregional crimes; exploring how the transregional crime prevention policy implemented by CIB, Criminal Investigation Bureau, and which problems will be discovered within the implementation process by CIB, and could it be possible to seek out the effective solution approaches for abovementioned problems; plumbing the possibilities of cooperation and integration among CIB, MJIB, Investigation Bureau, Ministry of Justice, MOFA, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, MAC, Mainland Affairs Council, and NSB, National Security Bureau; constructing a transregional crime prevention policy conduct which executed by CIB and specifically to display it, etc. Thus this dissertation will adopt the Policy Implementation Theory, Normative System Theory of Global Governance, and System Theory to as the study approaches and also exert the Document Analysis, In-Depth Interview, and Case study to as the study methods in this thesis so as to grope the predicaments of foreign relations, criminal jurisdiction, assistance in investigation abroad, and culprits’ repatriation from foreign countries which experienced by CIB’s investigators while executing the transregional crime prevention policy. Whereby the way to search out the leaks of the present transregional crime prevention policy and further to mull over the necessity and remedy of reformation on it. Finally, the author wish can help CIB to establish a concrete and feasible mode in the prevention of transregional crimes. The study findings are laying out as follows: 1. The aspect of foreign relations: 1) Political wrangling between both sides of Taiwan Strait is the main reason which lead to a barricade in execution of foreign relation policy; 2) Reinforcing the association with other countries so that to build up the substantial contact channel; 3) Striving for Interpol observer status so as to exert its law enforcement resources to fight against transregional crimes; 4) The relevant budgets on fighting against transregional crimes should be prepared sufficiently so as to make the execution of foreign relation policy more smoothly; 5) CIB should think up a method to expand the number of police liaison officers to other countries so as to construct a global prevention network on fighting against the transregional crimes. 2. The aspect of criminal jurisdiction: 1) The obscure content of our domestic law undoubtedly will influence the claim of criminal jurisdiction to other countries; 2) The conflict and coopetition of criminal jurisdiction should be settled through the way of negotiation in light of the priority order of international jurisdiction; 3) Our executed projects of criminal jurisdiction policy should try to write into the agreement of joint fight against transregional crimes with other countries so as to explicitly regulate each country’s responsibilities and duties. 3. The aspect of assistance in investigation abroad: 1) It’s a specific policy on combating transregional crimes if the international intelligence could be interchanged through the way of mutual benefit and collaboration; 2) The cooperation pattern of “police to police” is the concrete policy which used by CIB to fight against transregional crimes; 3) It is necessary to establish a dual investigation mechanism so as to effectively solve the problem of evidential competence identification after taking the overseas evidences; 4) It will be appropriately to regulate the procedure of overseas evidences collection and the criterion of evidential competence identification by stipulating a special law; 5) The issue on collusion of transregional crime suspects could be prevented by means of scientific investigation or interrogation skills; 6) The nationals who had ever joined the transregional telecom fraud rings should be listed their name for departure control within a certain number of years under the balance prerequisite of human rights and national security so as to reduce the occurrence of aforesaid crime. 4. The aspect of culprits’ repatriation from foreign countries: 1) NSB is the best integration platform domestically in dealing with our culprits’ repatriation of serious transregional crime; 2) The governmental officials who dispatched to overseas embassies should forsake their institutional sectionalism and prejudice, and fully complying with their ambassador’s instructions so as to obtain the best benefit on handling of transregional crimes via joint cooperation; 3) The respective repatriation provision for Taiwanese and Chinese suspects should explicitly write into the “Agreement on Cross-Strait Cooperation in Combating Crimes and Mutual Legal Assistance between Taiwan and China”; 4) The penal code should be amended for raising penalty on the crime of transregional telecom fraud rings so as to reduce its occurrence rate more effectively; 5) Exerting the case involving country’s immigration regulation is a policy which widely and effectively used by CIB at present on repatriation of Taiwanese suspects that committing the transregional crimes in foreign countries.
显示于类别:	[政治系暨政治學系碩博士班] 博碩士論文

文件中的档案:

档案	描述	大小	格式	浏览次数
index.html		0Kb	HTML	362	检视/开启

检视Licence

在CCUR中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.

数据加载中.....