English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 47249/51115 (92%)
造訪人次 : 14072045      線上人數 : 309
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    主頁登入上傳說明關於CCUR管理 到手機版


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/39800


    題名: 論血親性交罪除罪化之可行性
    A Study on the Feasibility of Decriminalization of Incest
    作者: 楊佳勳
    貢獻者: 法律學系
    關鍵詞: 法益
    除罪化
    亂倫
    應罰性
    需罰性
    Legal Interest
    Incest
    Decriminalization
    Strafwürdigkeit
    Strafbedürftigkeit
    日期: 2018
    上傳時間: 2018-05-04 11:42:14 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 關於道德入罪化與除罪化向來為學界爭論已久之議題,本文以為,諸如通姦罪等與道德有關犯罪之除罪應屬可預見之將來,惟在這些犯罪中,關於血親性交罪存廢之討論甚少,一來本罪在實務上極少應用,二來本罪背後價值,代表了我國長久以來的倫常觀念。在倫常的框架下,許多人認為血親性交之行為應當譴責,而將血親性交罪視為理所當然,然本文對血親性交罪之存在正當性是存疑的。
    既欲探究血親性交之除罪化,必先知其為何形成。故在進入血親性交罪之法律層面探究前,本文將先由心理學、生物學社會學之視角出發,藉由摩根、弗洛伊德、涂爾幹等學者之理論與主張,探究「亂倫」之源頭與的成因為何?其究竟是一種人類先天具備的能力亦或後天環境所造成?有了初步之認識後,從歷史沿革角度出發,追本溯源,了解血親性交罪最初之立法目的及演變過程。之後再透過對我國與德國、日本及中國之相關規定、案例和解釋進行比較研究。藉由上述之研究與分析,對血親性交行為與其入罪,勾勒出一個清晰之樣貌。
    無保護法益即無處罰,若要探討犯罪的除罪化,必然會和法益概念有所牽連,故本文先針對法益概念加以分析,在對法益概念有進一步認識後,再從血親性交罪保護之法益角度切入。由我國及外國法觀之,血親性交罪之保護法益可大致分為性自主、家庭秩序、種族優生、道德善良風俗等,本文藉由分析此等法益,了解處罰血親性交之理由為何,之後藉由檢討血親性交罪之應罰性與需罰性,證實將血親性交入罪不甚合理,故本文作出應將血親性交罪予以除罪為當之結論。
    The issue of moral criminalization and decriminalization has always been a controversial issue in the academia. This article considered that such as adultery and other offenses related to moral should be decriminalized in the future. However, in these offenses, there are less discussion about the abolishment of the offense of incest. First of all, this offense is rarely used in practice. Secondly, the value behind this offense which is symbolized the long-standing ethics of our country. In the moral framework, many people thinks that the behavior of insect should be condemned, and considers the existence of the offense of incest as justified. Nevertheless, this article is skeptical about the existence of the offense of incest.

    To study the incest of the decriminalization, we must know why it is formed. Before we start the studying of legal perspective of incent, this article will start from the perspective of psychology, biology and sociology. To know what is the origin and cause of "incest" by Morgan, Freud, Durkheim and others theory and proposition. What is it exactly caused? The inherent ability or the acquired environment? When we have the basic understanding, we can also studying from the historical point of view and tracing the source to understand the original legislative purpose and the evolution of the offense process. Then through the comparison of the legislations, cases and legal explanations of the incest from R.O.C to Germany, China and Japan. With these studies and analysis, we can outline a clear appearance of incest.

    No punishment without protection of legal interests. To discuss the decriminalization of offenses, necessarily to be connected with theory of legal interests. So this article will analyze with regard to legal interests and function of the criminal law. After we learn more about the theory of legal interests, we can cut to the point of the protection of legal interests of incest. Viewed by law of R.O.C and others country, the protection of legal interests of incest can classify as sexual autonomy, the order of family, eugenics and moral. By analyzing these interests to know the reason about incest punishment . After by analyzing " Strafwürdigkeit " and " Strafbedürftigkeit " about offense of incest to know criminalization of the incest is not reasonable.this article considered the incest should be decriminalized.
    顯示於類別:[法律學系暨法律學研究所] 博碩士論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    index.html0KbHTML203檢視/開啟


    在CCUR中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋