論宗教在霍布斯思想中的角色

CCUR > College of Social Sciences > Department of Political Science & Graduate Institute of Political Science > project > Item 987654321/39468

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/39468

Title:	論宗教在霍布斯思想中的角色 On How Religion Matters in Thomas Hobbes$S Thought
Authors:	梁裕康
Contributors:	政治學系
Keywords:	霍布斯史欽納馬蒂尼奇宗教科學
Date:	2016-08
Issue Date:	2018-03-06 10:54:14 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	宗教在霍布斯的理論中，究竟扮演何種角色？宗教在霍布斯的理論中，究竟扮演何種角色？宗教在霍布斯的理論中，究竟扮演何種角色？宗教在霍布斯的理論中，究竟扮演何種角色？對於這個問題，傳統的見解對於這個問題，傳統的見解對於這個問題，傳統的見解對於這個問題，傳統的見解認為在霍布斯的理論中，在霍布斯的理論中，宗教不具任何重要性。然而另一種見解卻認為宗教是其理論中的重要成分。本研究以宗教是其理論中的重要成分。本研究分別以史欽納 (Quentin Skinner)與馬蒂尼奇(Aloysius Martinich)的理論為代表，探討二種說法點。本研究將指出，二者雖然源於類似的詮釋方法，卻得出了相反的結論。要評價二者的優劣，本研究將以另一種迂迴的方式切入。從霍布斯理論中宗教與科學的關連，來探討宗教在其整體理論中地位。藉由科學知識社會學 (the sociology of scientific knowledge)的途徑的途徑，將可發現十七世紀的科學與宗教並非對立而是融合的關係，因此宗教性的詮釋是較有說服力。 Traditionally some secular interpretation holds that religion does not play any crucial part in Thomas Hobbes’s philosophy. However, some religious interpretation contends it does. Arguing from the similar philosophical basis, Quentin Skinner as a secular interpreter and Aloysius Martinich as a religious one developed their theories contrary to each other. This project introduces an approach of the sociology of scientific knowledge to evaluate both interpretations. By examining the interplay between religion and science in the 17th century England, the relation between the two parts was coherent rather than antagonistic. This will lead to the conclusion that the religious interpretation of Hobbes is more plausible.
Appears in Collections:	[Department of Political Science & Graduate Institute of Political Science ] project

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
index.html		0Kb	HTML	189	View/Open

View Licence

Loading...