文化大學機構典藏 CCUR:Item 987654321/39344
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 47126/50992 (92%)
Visitors : 13862868      Online Users : 219
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/39344


    Title: Using the HSPF and SWMM Models in a High Pervious Watershed and Estimating Their Parameter Sensitivity
    Authors: Tsai, LY (Tsai, Lin-Yi)
    Chen, CF (Chen, Chi-Feng)
    Fan, CH (Fan, Chi-Hsuan)
    Lin, JY (Lin, Jen-Yang)
    Contributors: 土資系
    Keywords: watershed management
    HSPF
    SWMM
    sensitivity analysis
    Date: 2017-10
    Issue Date: 2018-01-25 14:09:49 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: Models are necessary tools for watershed management. However, applying watershed models is time consuming and requires technical knowledge, including model selection and validation. The objective of this study is to assess two commonly used watershed models and their parameter sensitivity to reduce model loadings and to gain a better understanding of the model performances. The Hydrological Simulation Program-Fortran (HSPF) model and Storm Water Management Model (SWMM) were applied to a mostly forested Taiwanese reservoir watershed with pollution from tea plantations. Statistical analysis showed that both models are suitable for the studied watershed, but the performances of the flow and water quality simulations are different. The mean flow simulated by SWMM was lower than the experimental observations. The HSPF model performed better, possibly because the soil in the study area is highly permeable and the HSPF model has more precise soil layer calculations. SWMM may underestimate the total phosphorous (TP) and suspended solid (SS) loads following small storm events in highly permeable watersheds. The Latin Hypercube-One factor At a Time (LH-OAT) method was used to determine the parameter sensitivity of the HSPF model and SWMM. In both of the models, the parameters related to infiltration and soil characteristics strongly affected the flow simulation, except when using the Horton infiltration method in the SWMM. Manning's roughness coefficient for pervious areas was more sensitive in SWMM than in the HSPF model because SWMM has fewer parameters.
    Relation: WATER 卷: 9 期: 10 文獻號碼: 780
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Natural Resources ] journal articles

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML365View/Open


    All items in CCUR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©  2006-2025  - Feedback