文化大學機構典藏 CCUR:Item 987654321/38319
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 46962/50828 (92%)
Visitors : 12409015      Online Users : 1276
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/38319


    Title: 另案監聽法制之研究
    A Study of Derivative Wiretapping Legal System
    Authors: 姜沅均
    Contributors: 法律學系
    Keywords: 通訊保障及監察法
    通訊監察
    另案監聽
    組織犯罪
    隱私權
    Communication Security and Surveillance Act
    communication surveillance
    derivative monitoring
    organized crime
    privacy
    Date: 2017
    Issue Date: 2017-10-17 11:31:29 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 在今日,全球化的時空背景,通訊設備日新月異,發展速度甚為驚人,的確帶給人民無數生活上的便利,但水能載舟,亦能覆舟,社會上的犯罪人亦隨之使用通訊設備進行犯罪行為,如法律不因應犯罪型態或偵查機關無設法利用通訊設備實施偵查,將不利於維護國家與社會安全。
       由於通訊監察對於人民隱私的侵害甚為強烈及廣泛,又係以秘密方式進行,導致偵查上處於一個不確定性的狀態,無法明確被監察人的通話內容,所以發現被監察人另案的犯罪行為,在實務上不在少數,針對另案內容在刑事訴訟上的證據能力適用,於2014年通保法修正後採取原則排除的明文規定,在刑事訴訟以發現真實的理念之下,係屬不利於偵查的實施,本文目的以從通訊監察的整體概念延伸至發現另案內容而是否有刑事訴訟上證據能力的適用,以作探討及檢討。

    Nowadays the rapid development of new communication devices is so amazing, these devices indeed bring people countless convenience for living. But water is a boon in the desert, but the drowning man curses it, the criminals in our society also make use of communication devices to commit crimes. If the authorities do not take advantage of communication devices to investigate the crimes, it will be harmful to the protection of national society.
       At the same time, because of the way investigation agency do investigate is classified to secret investigation. This way leads to the whole investigation process in an uncertain state, we cannot do any research with conversations talked by the man who is under investigation. So, we found that there is a lot of crimes which are separated action in technically. The content of separated action is applicable to force of evidence. During 2014, after the amendment of the Law of Communication Protection, this law is applied to the principle excluded regulation and results in disadvantage of investigation of crimes in practice. This article tries to discuss the content about communication investigation extending to find separated cases whether applicable to The Code of Criminal Procedure.
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Law & Graduate Institute of Law ] thesis

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML159View/Open


    All items in CCUR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback