報紙對同性婚姻的框架研究：以2011-2015年之「多元成家」新聞為例

CCUR > College of Journalism and Mass Communications > Department of Journalism & Graduate Institute of Journalism > thesis > Item 987654321/38305

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/38305

Title:	報紙對同性婚姻的框架研究：以2011-2015年之「多元成家」新聞為例 The Frame Study of Same-sex Marriage by Taiwan Four Major Daily Newspapers A Case of 2011~2015 Diverse Family Formation’s News
Authors:	賴曼妮
Contributors:	新聞學系
Keywords:	內容分析法多元成家同性婚姻新聞框架 Content Analysis The Draft for Diverse Family Formation Same-sex Marriage News Frame
Date:	2017
Issue Date:	2017-10-17 10:48:54 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	關於「家」的概念隨著社會變遷與人權重視，多了許多不同於過往的詮釋，放眼全球，有許多國家欲爭取不限性別、人人平等的成家權利，而「多元成家」法案則是台灣在這股浪潮中，爭取婚姻平權的新主張。所謂「多元成家」法案為「婚姻平權」、「伴侶制度」及「多人家屬」三項草案之結合，即為新聞媒體所稱的「多元成家」法案。為了瞭解台灣報紙媒體對於多元成家議題報導的內容框架建構，本研究以內容分析法做為本研究之研究方法，探討台灣四大報：《中國時報》、《聯合報》、《自由時報》及《蘋果日報》共714則樣本是如何呈現此公共議題的新聞框架。研究結果顯示台灣紙媒在報導多元成家議題時所使用的新聞框架，從過往大眾對於同性戀者較具有的既定印象，如易得愛滋病或是恐懼同志等刻板印象，轉變成以演藝人員支持多元成家法案通過，為婚姻平權發聲的框架來包裝該議題，且報導立場較偏向支持修法，但四報在報導中，幾乎沒有詳述解釋多元成家法案內容或是相關的法條及法律；《中國時報》在多元成家議題上報導篇數最多，且與《聯合報》均多以娛樂新聞為報導主軸；報導數量最少的《自由時報》，則偏重有衝突性的事件；《蘋果日報》與《中國時報》較常提供讀者一個發聲的平台，供讀者投書至報紙專欄中；各報採用反對方的消息來源比例較低，報導立場較傾向支持，在消息來源的選擇上，除了《聯合報》外，其餘三報皆最常引用「演藝界人士」的說法，《聯合報》則較常選擇政治相關的消息來源。 With the social changes and the rising attention of human rights, the concept of "home" has different meanings from the previous ones. Fighting for gender equality and seeking equal rights for everyone, become the worldwide belief. Taiwan also steps on this wave and the "Diverse Family Formation", the marriage of equal rights, is the most important event in Taiwan during this wave. "Diverse Family Formation" as a draft law, comprises three different versions, however the Taiwanese mass media used to name the "Diverse Family Formation" for their convenience in writing reports. In order to analyze the Taiwan newspaper media coverage for the diverse family formation event, this study adopts content analysis for analysis. This thesis explores four major newspapers in Taiwan: the China Times, the United Daily News, the Liberty Times and the Apple Daily News to look at their respective news frameworks of this event. The main results of the study show that the mass media adopt different news frameworks to report diverse family formation event. In the early period of this event, the mass media used to stigmatize the homosexuals, e.g. they are the community with relation to the AIDS. Further, the mass media adopts fear comrades and other stereotypes to frame the homosexual/same sex relationship. This research also finds that the mass media prefer to report the articles from Taiwanese entertainers’ social network sites to support the diverse family formation. As we look at the differences from these four newspapers, we find that they almost provide no ignores the details of the diverse family formation or the relevant laws and regulations. The four newspapers seldom take the opponents of the laws as the news sources. The United Daily News prefer to take political figures’ words as news sources, comparatively, the other three newspapers most commonly cited "entertainers" argument.
Appears in Collections:	[Department of Journalism & Graduate Institute of Journalism] thesis

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
index.html		0Kb	HTML	324	View/Open

View Licence

Loading...