文化大學機構典藏 CCUR:Item 987654321/37913
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 47249/51115 (92%)
Visitors : 14070920      Online Users : 292
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/37913


    Title: 論限制無罪判決上訴與速審權之保障
    A Study of the Restrictions on Innocence Appeals and Right to a Speedy Trial
    Authors: 姜智青
    Contributors: 法律學系
    Keywords: 不對稱上訴
    禁止雙重危險原則
    無罪推定原則
    速審權
    迅速審判
    刑事妥速審判法
    Asymmetrical Rules of Appeal
    Double Jeopardy
    Presumption of Innocence
    Right to a Speedy Trial
    Speedy Trial
    The Criminal Speedy Trial Act
    Date: 2017
    Issue Date: 2017-08-29 09:37:14 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 為保障刑事被告於憲法上所享有之速審權,並回應實務上審判遲延問題,立法院遂於2010年4月23日制定「刑事妥速審判法」,總統並於同年5月19日公布實施。本法全文共14條,其中重要之規範大致有審判中羈押期間限制、有罪判決審判遲延「應減輕其刑」、限制無罪判決上訴等規定。
    本文擬透過文獻資料、法條釋義與美國、日本迅速審判法制之優點與缺點,評述速審法第8條、第9條於實務運作後所生之問題,並附帶提出修法建議,以供未來修法酌參,建置完備之台灣迅速審判法制,讓所有刑事案件之被告均得享有受公平法院迅速且公開審判之權利,避免案件因無故稽延而使被告速審權蒙受損害,兼顧公共利益維護與個人基本權利保障。
    In order to protect the criminal defendant’s constitutional rights to speedy trial and respond to trial delay problems. The Legislative Yuan approved at third reading “The Criminal Speedy Trial Act” on April 23, 2010. The President promulgated these bills on May 19, 2010. The Act includes 14 articles and the key regulations are as follows the duration limitation of detention, the remedy for defendant’s who their rights to speedy trial are invaded, and the restrictions on innocence appeals.
    In this article, we tried to explain the articles 8 and 9 of the Criminal Speedy Trial Act and compare the thus merits and demerits of the speedy trial system in the United States and Japan, and present our suggestions for future legislation work of a Taiwan speedy trial system. Let all criminal cases the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial by an impartial tribunal. This guarantee is an important safeguard to prevent the government prejudice to the defendant’s constitutional rights and the maintenance of public welfare and the guarantee of the fundamental human rights of individuals.
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Law & Graduate Institute of Law ] thesis

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML154View/Open


    All items in CCUR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback