本研究主要在探討樂趣化與傳統式兩種不同教學法，依不同課程設計模式，對於國中生在滿意度、動作技能評量上是否有差異。研究採實驗設計法，以台北市立明德國民中學七年級40位網球初學者，採用「網球動作技能測驗」「網球學習滿意度」為工具進行研究，並以隨機抽樣方式，分成兩組，其中一組為樂趣化網球教學組，另一組為傳統式教學組，經過八週的實驗教學，以前後測成績為學習效果之比較資料，經獨立樣本與相依樣本t考驗之統計分析後，結果歸納如下：
一、國中生樂趣化網球組感覺無聊知覺達顯著差異，傳統式網球組未達顯著差異，樂趣化較傳統式教學組感覺學習享受效果。
二、國中生動作技能學習結果，樂趣化與傳統式網球教學組均達顯著差異P<.05，樂趣化與傳統式網球組在正拍著地擊球達顯著差異，而反拍著地擊球未達顯著性差異，樂趣化較傳統式學習效果佳。
This study mainly discusses about two different teaching methods including fun and traditional. According to different curriculum design patterns, we can find out the differences between satisfaction and skills of students. In this study, 40 tennis beginners from Grade 7 of National High School in Taipei were selected as experimental group. The tennis skill test and the tennis learning satisfaction were used as the tools. The students were divided into two groups by random sampling. One group is the fun of teaching group, and the other group is the traditional teaching group. After eight weeks of experimental teaching, we can see the test scores for the learning effect before and after teaching. With independent samples and dependent samples T test statistical analysis, the results are summarized as follows:
First, the students in the fun group had significant differences in boring sensation, but the traditional group did not reach significant differences. The fun group felt more enjoy than the traditional group in learning.
Second, the learning skills of students in both fun and traditional group were significantly different. Fun and traditional groups’ forehand stroke were significant differences, while the backhand strokes’ were not significant differences. The fun group learned better than the traditional group.
