文化大學機構典藏 CCUR:Item 987654321/35692
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 47249/51115 (92%)
造访人次 : 14070838      在线人数 : 279
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧:
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号",以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻,建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段,可获得较完整数据
  • 进阶搜寻
    主页登入上传说明关于CCUR管理 到手机版


    jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/35692


    题名: 論水平卡特爾之構成要件
    The Study on Elements of Horizontal Cartels
    作者: 朱麗亞
    贡献者: 法律學系
    关键词: 聯合行為
    卡特爾
    寡占市場
    促進行為
    法律經濟學
    法理學
    日期: 2017
    上传时间: 2017-03-28 10:38:22 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 寡占廠商因市場結構的特性,因自身經濟利益最大化之理性考量,而生之有意識的價格跟隨行為,導致不須競爭就產生一致的行為,得透過賽局理論證明之。論水平卡特爾之構成要件,促進行為理論乃實務上所發展出來,用以解決合意要件之舉證困難。當事業之間存有促進行為,政府或法院得據以證明水平卡特爾協議之存在,構成違法的一致行為。產學之間爭論不休之際,除了經濟證據之考量,傳統法釋義學、法理學所扮演之角色何在?
    Firms of oligopoly market usually behave similarly especially on price-fixing, because of the particular structure of the market in which firms interact with each other intensely. By Game Theory, we could find the above assumption proved.
    Regarding the element of horizontal cartel, the theory of Facilitating Devices is exercised in practice due to the difficulty of proving the existence of “agreement.” When facilitating devices exist, governments or court regard them as evidence to prove that there is cartel agreement between firms, and concludes that the firm violate the Fair Trade Law because of their illegal concerted action.
    However, there are still arguments between scholars. In addition to economical evidences, what is the value of Rechtsdogmatik? Where is the role played by Jurisprudence?
    显示于类别:[法律學系暨法律學研究所] 博碩士論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    index.html0KbHTML292检视/开启


    在CCUR中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈