文化大學機構典藏 CCUR:Item 987654321/34429
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 47145/51011 (92%)
造访人次 : 13885117      在线人数 : 1227
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧:
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号",以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻,建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段,可获得较完整数据
  • 进阶搜寻
    主页登入上传说明关于CCUR管理 到手机版


    jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/34429


    题名: 檢討米爾斯海默對大國之判準--兼論其對中國地位之評估
    Examining Mearsheimer's Criteria on Great Power: Assessing China's Status
    作者: 唐欣偉
    贡献者: 政治系
    关键词: 米爾斯海默
    大國
    中國
    軍事國際體系
    軍費
    Mearsheimer
    Great Power
    China
    International Military System
    Military Expenditure
    日期: 2016-01
    上传时间: 2016-10-11 13:46:13 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 米爾斯海默將大國界定為有足夠傳統武力與第一強權對決的國家,而美中兩大國將發生衝突。但他並未具體說明何謂足夠的傳統武力,而且在經驗研究中列出的大國往往不符上述定義。在常用國力指標中,軍費比軍隊人數或綜合國力指標更適於衡量米氏的國力概念。目前美國軍費仍遠高於中國,而後者要進一步縮小與美國之差距,才能符合米氏理論中的大國定義。
    Mearsheimer argues that a great power must have sufficient conventional force to fight against a more powerful one, and a conflict will occur between two great powers- the US and China. However, he does not define "sufficient conventional force" specifically, nor list great powers strictly based on the above requirement in his empirical study. Among common indicators of national power, military expenditure performs better than military manpower or the Composite Indicator of National Capabilities for measuring Mearsheimer's concept of power. Since the US spends far more than China in arms, the latter is not qualified as a great power in Mearsheimer's sense unless the gap of expenditure between them decreases.
    關聯: 遠景基金會季刊 ; 17卷1期 (2016 / 01 / 01) , P1 - 31
    显示于类别:[政治系暨政治學系碩博士班] 期刊論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    index.html0KbHTML352检视/开启


    在CCUR中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈