文化大學機構典藏 CCUR:Item 987654321/34261
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 47040/50906 (92%)
造访人次 : 13092482      在线人数 : 880
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧:
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号",以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻,建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段,可获得较完整数据
  • 进阶搜寻
    主页登入上传说明关于CCUR管理 到手机版


    jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/34261


    题名: 再探勞工抗爭行為阻卻刑事違法問題
    Revisiting the Problems Pertinent to the Criminal Justification for the Labor Protest Activity
    作者: 黃宗旻
    贡献者: 法律系
    关键词: 阻卻違法
    優越利益衡量
    可罰的違法性
    爭議權
    市民不服從
    法益
    Justification for criminal infringements
    Evaluations on superior interests
    Penalized breach of the law
    Right to dispute
    Civil disobedience
    Legal goods
    日期: 2010-04
    上传时间: 2016-09-26 15:05:10 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 即使2009 年中通過新的勞資爭議處理法,增設了勞動爭議行為阻卻刑事 違法的依據,但對於我國普遍存在的勞工抗爭活動型態其實助益不大,問題的 解決最終仍須回歸刑法上的實質違法性原理。臺灣因為特殊的歷史及社會脈 絡,對於勞工運動的態度較為保守,在這樣的背景下實務工作會更加需要論述 工具,故本文旨在提供實務上可用的判斷架構及操作準則。刑事違法的實質在 於法益侵害,阻卻違法的判斷可先透過連結刑法「法益」概念與憲法的基本權 保護意旨,將多元的考量引入刑法價值體系中,再透過「優越利益衡量」原理 及「可罰的違法性」理論的運用,開展行為阻卻違法的可能性。本文並舉三則 案例實際操作此判斷流程,附帶論及「爭議權」的憲法上地位、抗爭行為作為 「市民不服從」權之行使等問題,期能提供實務處理此類案件參考。
    A criminal justification for industrial actions is provided in the Amendment of the Settlement of Labor Disputes Law, which has been adopted in 2009. However, the amendment does not provide relief for most of the labor protest activities in our country. An immediate resolution still lies in the theoryof substantial justification under the criminal law. Due to the unique historical and social context in Taiwan, the societyholds a more conservative attitude toward the labor activities. Under such a context, the appropriate illustrations are required for the practice. This paper aims at providing some practical guidelines and criteria. The core of criminal infringement is the breach of legal goods. While determining the criminal justification, we mayintr oduce a multiple consideration to the criminal legal matrix firstlythr ough linking the legal goods with the constitutional rights. Then we use the principle of "superior interest" and the "penalized breach of the law" theoryto extend the probabilityo f justification. Three cases are demonstrated in this paper. In addition, the paper deals with the constitutional status of "right to dispute" and the industrial actions as "civil disobedience".
    關聯: 軍法專刊 56:2 2010.04[民99.04] 頁72-86
    显示于类别:[法律學系暨法律學研究所] 期刊論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    index.html0KbHTML245检视/开启


    在CCUR中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈