文化大學機構典藏 CCUR:Item 987654321/34036
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 46965/50831 (92%)
Visitors : 12666008      Online Users : 673
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/34036


    Title: 股份有限公司董事報酬請求權之研究
    A Study of the Quantum Meruit Claim of the Director of a Company Limited by Shares
    Authors: 戴銘昇
    Contributors: 法律系
    Keywords: 報酬
    報酬請求權
    董事
    薪資報酬委員會(薪酬委員會)
    經營與所有分離
    默示報酬
    Compensation
    Quantum Meruit Claim
    Director
    Compensation Committee
    Separation of Ownership and Control
    Implied Compensation
    Date: 2014-09
    Issue Date: 2016-09-07 09:51:46 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 公司法第196條第1項雖有對於董事的報酬決定程序之規定,惟未經此一程序時,董事是否有報酬請求權?此一問題,我國實務及學說之見解紛呈,頗具爭議。若依據美國法制,董事之報酬原則上限於有明示約定時始能請求。若依據日本法制,通說認為未經法定程序者,董事無報酬請求權。本文認為只有在董事與公司原有約定報酬,股東會選任董事時未同時決議董事報酬,而董事在「就任前」便已向公司請求報酬時,才會產生董事有無報酬請求權之爭議。而依據民法第547條之規定,董事應可向公司主張報酬請求權。不過,若從立法論而言,似可考慮修改公司法,明定董事必有報酬,以建立良好的公司治理。
    Although Article 196 I of the Company Act provides the determining procedure of a director's compensation, may a director file a quantum meruit claim without this procedure? Regarding this question, practices and scholarship in Taiwan are in sharp disagreement. According to the U.S. legal regime, in order that a director may receive compensation, there must have been an express contract. According to the Japanese legal regime, the prevailing opinion is that without the legal procedure, a director cannot receive compensation. This study thinks that the issue whether a director has a quantum meruit claim only occurs in the following situation: a director had an agreement of receiving compensation with the company, he was elected as director at a shareholders' meeting without adopting a resolution to give him compensation, he claimed compensation to company before assuming that post. According to Article 547 of Civil Law, a director should possess a right to claim compensation from the company. But, in order to establish good corporate governance, a better solution may be to modify the current Company Act so as to provide that a director should have a right to claim compensation.
    Relation: 政大法學評論 ; 138期 (2014 / 09 / 01) , P181 - 235
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Law & Graduate Institute of Law ] journal articles

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML259View/Open


    All items in CCUR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback