本研究旨在瞭解社區居民之「健康促進生活型態」與「幸福感」之現況，並瞭解不同「個人背景變項」社區居民在「健康促進生活型態」及「幸福感」上的之差異情形，以及探討社區居民在「健康促進生活型態」及「幸福感」間的相關性，進而探討可預測「健康促進生活型態」及「幸福感」的相關因素。
本研究係以「調查法」進行採「立意取樣」之抽樣方式，以基隆市七堵區設籍居民為調查對象，抽取基隆市七堵區五個里居民450名為研究樣本，回收剔除廢卷後，有效問卷共計405份，有效回收率逹90.00％，所使用的測量工具包括：「個人資料調查表」、「健康促進生活型態量表」與「幸福感量表」。以統計軟體SPSS 22.0 版進行各類資料的統計分析，主要研究結果如下：
一、社區居民之整體「健康促進生活型態」傾向於「中上」程度，其中，以「人際支持」最高，其次依序為「自我實現」、「壓力處理」、「飲食行為」、「健康責任」，而以「運動行為」最低。
二、社區居民之「幸福感」傾向於「中高」程度，其中，以「正向情緒」之幸福感為最高，其次為：「樂觀」與「個人成就」，而以「生活滿意」為最低。
三、社區居民個人背景變項中之「婚姻狀態」在「健康促進生活型態」之「自我實現」構面中有顯著差異，已婚者較離婚者，其自我實現之健康促進生活型態較佳；此外，在健康促進生活型態之「運動行為」構面中，喪偶者較離婚者有較良好的運動行為。
四、社區居民之「自覺健康狀況」與整體「健康促進生活型態」之間呈顯著低度之正相關。亦即社區居民之「自覺健康狀況」越佳，則其「健康促進生活型態」越為良好。
五、社區居民之「家庭經濟壓力」與整體「健康促進生活型態」之間呈顯著低度之負相關。亦即社區居民之「家庭經濟壓力」越大，則其「健康促進生活型態」越差。
六、社區居民之「自覺健康狀況」與整體「幸福感」之間呈顯著低度之正相關。亦即社區居民之「自覺健康狀況」越佳，則其幸福感越高。
七、社區居民之「家庭經濟壓力」與整體「幸福感」之間呈顯著低度之負相關。亦即社區居民之「家庭經濟壓力」越大，則其幸福感越低。
八、社區居民之「健康促進生活型態」與「幸福感」之間有顯著中度之正相關。亦即社區居民之「健康促進生活型態」愈良好者，其「幸福感」就愈高。
九、社區居民之「個人背景變項」（自覺健康狀況、居住狀況）與「健康促進生活型態」對「幸福感」有顯著解釋力，可解釋其總變異量達32%，亦即「自覺健康狀況」越好者、「與配偶同住」者、「與配偶子女同住」者，以及「健康促進生活型態」越良好者，其幸福感就越高。
根據上述研究結論，因此建議社區居民積極建立良好的運動行為，以利自身健康；適度建立良好的運動與休閒生活型態，以利壓力之紓解；常存正向積極之心念，關注身心靈健康，提昇幸福感。
The purpose of the study was to understand the current situation and correlation of the community residents’ “health-promoting lifestyle” and “well-being” in Cidu District in Keelung City.
The study applied a survey to collect data with purposive sampling method to select community residents of cidu district in Keelung city The reserch samples were 450 in total, with 405 valid and the effective recovery rate was at 90.00%. The research instruments included: Personal Data Questionnaire, Health-promoting Lifestyle Profile, and Well-being Scale were used. The SPSS 22.0 was utilized to analyzed the collected data. Descriptive statistics, One-Samples t Test, one-way ANOVA, Scheffe’s method, Pearson product-moment correlation, and multiple regression analysis were used. The researrch results are as follows:
1. The health promotion lifestyles of community residents tends to be good; the highest score of health promotion lifestyles was interpersonal support, and the lowest was physical activity.
2.The well-being of community residents was at moderate level; the highest score of well-being was positive emotion, and the lowest was life satisfication.
3.The relationship between health-promoting lifestyle and well-being was significant moderate positive correlation.
4.The background variables (selfperception of health condition; resident condition) and health promotion lifestyles can effectively predict their well-being, explaining 32% of total variance. Self-perception of health, having the greatest predictive ability. The study shows that community residents with greater self-perception have greater well-being.
Based on the conclusions in this study, it is suggested that community residents should develop the good health-promoting lifestyle of exercise behavior; and enhance the exercise and lesisure lifestyle, In addition, the relevant authorities should improve the health promotion lifestyles and well-being of the community residents.
